Lynne Spreen's Reviews > Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3448260
's review

really liked it

When I was at the halfway point I became struck by what a jerk SJ was. Yes, he was brilliant and all that. But he seemed to view other humans as nothing more than ants in his ant farm, sub-biologicals that he could squish whenever he felt like it. And did.

Some might say that his gifts to tech development, or the fact that he changed and invented whole industries, would compensate. Maybe the two things went together, cruelty and brilliance.

But the lesson to be drawn here, future CEOs, isn't that his cruelty fed his brilliance. He was brilliant, and he was cruel, and they weren't linked. He was aware of the pain he was causing other people, yet like so many other overbearing, thoughtless and petulant overlords, Jobs was thin-skinned. Also, I don't believe that his often-cited sense of abandonment, from having been put up for adoption, justifies his behavior.

He was, as the author put it, "bratty." Jobs would fiddle with design changes to the point of driving his team mad. A thousand different variations of white weren't satisfactory. He wanted a new color to be invented, regardless of the damage done to the rollout of the new object.

As I said, I'm only halfway through the book. Hopefully there'll be some positive info about SJ that will balance out some of the negativity I've spelled out. I'll finish this review when I finish the book.

Nov. 8, 2011: I finished the book. Here are the rest of my thoughts.

Isaacson makes an interesting point when he says Jobs was a genius. He means genius not in terms of a high IQ, but in terms of an ability to see things in surges of intuition, inspiration, and creativity. (BTW here's an interesting rundown of the smartest people on the planet: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-sm...) Because of his genius, I agree that Jobs deserves to be included in the company of Edison, Franklin, et al.

Steve Jobs pushed everybody until they wanted to kill him, but the pushing yielded amazing, brilliant new products. His unique brainpower allowed him to see how things might align, merge, and serve each other, and how utility might be blended with art. That vision led to creations of whole industries.

His obsession with perfection and control led him to flirt with emulating the Big Brother that Apple was created to bring down. One of the fascinating threads of this book was the debate between proponents of closed and open systems. Was it better to manufacture a pristine, inflexible system or the messier free thinking open system? And what were the implications of that belief on Jobs' view of his customers and his worldview?

Yet he defined petulance. His food had to be just so. He would send back a glass of orange juice three times until finally satisfied it was fresh. He was vindictive, cruel and even Machiavellian. He wasn't much of a family man, and he ignored his kids to a painful extent. Isaacson mused that Jobs' meanness wasn't a critical part of his success. He was totally aware of its effect on others, yet he indulged.

In spite of my aversion to the man, I actually felt empowered as I came to the end of the book. Steve Jobs had lived by certain precepts, which in the current economy we could all benefit from:

---Know your value
---Have a skill you can sell. Be really, really good at something.
---Things can turn around if you persevere, but don't be afraid to walk away.

Unbending to the end, even the prospect of death didn't soften him up much, but he brought me up short on the last page of the book, because I am obsessed with the same question:

"I like to think that something survives after you die. It's strange to think that you accumulate all this experience, and maybe a little wisdom, and it just goes away. So I really want to believe that something survives, and that maybe your consciousness endures."

I closed the book with a bit more compassion for this difficult man and went outside to pick cilantro for that night's dinner. Since we'd just had a serious storm, I declined to rinse it. I simply cleaned it, thinking, “Organic and pristine from the garden. Steve would’ve approved.”
260 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Steve Jobs.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 1, 2011 – Shelved
Started Reading
November 5, 2011 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-39 of 39 (39 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Andrew Robins I agree. I actually think less of him having read most of it than I did before I started, and I say that as someone who has been an Apple fan and user for 20 years now.


Lynne Spreen Andrew wrote: "I agree. I actually think less of him having read most of it than I did before I started, and I say that as someone who has been an Apple fan and user for 20 years now."
It's a bummer, huh, Andrew? Such an awesome leader, yet so flawed. But that ending got me. Finally, in the end, the poor guy realized he couldn't beat death. Thanks for commenting.


Anirban Bandopadhyay Who's a Scientist?Who tries to keep balance between human-being & tech & Who can be leader? That person who shows the way.SJ is that kinda lord.Some times he looks like an arrogant.Walter's pen shows how a hero seems like a zero."With great power comes great responsibility"+ comes huge criticism too.


Renee Andrew wrote: "I agree. I actually think less of him having read most of it than I did before I started, and I say that as someone who has been an Apple fan and user for 20 years now."
I agree with your statement Andrew.....I'm only about 200 pages in but I can't shake how horribly manipulative the man was and treated everyone like the gum under his shoe....oh wait, he rarely wore shoes for the first half of his life....lol!


message 5: by Elaine (new) - added it

Elaine So brilliant and so flawed... Kinda just makes him human... Doesn't it?


Renee Elaine wrote: "So brilliant and so flawed... Kinda just makes him human... Doesn't it?"

Yes it does indeed make him human but what really has bugged me through the course of reading this book, is that he constantly manipulated everyone he came in contact with and believed everyone else was flawed. My issue is that so many people hold him up to be some sort of god. Simply stated....he was an absolute jerk.


message 7: by Vikas (new)

Vikas Patil wow..what a reaview...I am yet to read this book. And about SJ, though, he created some of the greatest products in the history of mankind, changed the industry entirely, this might make him a genius or a great innovator or leader, but not a great human being. He would definately fall short there. And i guess he never cared about it.


Lynne Spreen Thanks for the compliment, Vikas! It's interesting that SJ had that aspect to his personality. The author WI was interviewed on Fareed's show and WI said same thing I did: future CEOs shouldn't take away that being an @$$**** is necessary to succeed in biz. Best wishes.


message 9: by Vikas (new)

Vikas Patil Absolutley right !!! Thanks !


message 10: by Mark (new) - rated it 2 stars

Mark Cameron After completing his biography one can only surmise the real impact he could have had in the world if philanthropy had been one of his strengths. No doubt a brilliant man , unfortunately we all live with critical flaws and every step we take should improve our lives and someone elses because the benefits are mutually rewarding. He was a master in one arena.


Lynne Spreen Hi Mark, good point. Steve Jobs was a master in ONE arena. You only gave it 3 stars; does that mean you weren't that impressed or just sort of lukewarm about the book, or did it have particular flaws in your opinion?
I'm just curious.


message 12: by Sid (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sid When a person pushes people do their best, be their best, is that person a good or bad?

And the fact that his outcomes bought happiness to a lot more other people - does it make him bad? or a jerk? as you call him.


Lynne Spreen His pushing people was good. The gratuitous meanness was incomprehensible. The two were not related. He was a jerk, and he produced good things. Neither detracts from the other.


message 14: by Sid (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sid "The two were not related."

Actually, I am saying both are related. If he wasn't driven to what he thought was right and in the process, rejecting everything bad/ugly with the ferocity that he did, and extremely focussed on the outcome, he would not have been able to help create the stuff he did.

Both are intricately linked.


message 15: by Lynne (last edited Jan 01, 2015 06:30AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Lynne Spreen I don't agree. I'll give you some examples:

He lied to people. He ripped them off. He denied them legitimate pay and benefits and then insulted them when they demanded that which he had guaranteed them by contract. He stood people up without explanation, having asked them to meet; the latter were not employees. He mused to a third party, while in the company of his wife, that he still wondered if he should have married a previous girlfriend. The list goes on but you get my point. These behaviors did not cause his entrepreneurial greatness.


message 16: by Sid (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sid We can argue over and over about this, but we may not agree eventually.

What am I trying to say? His good does not exist without his bad (whatever that was), with his employees or not. If he did not lie in those occasions, the history would be altered and the outcomes would have been different. Do you think he would have been an entrepreneur if he didn't do any of those things he did or give us what we have today? I honestly don't think so. We would have something completely different, if he was less mean or didn't lie in those occasions.

Can you understand that?

On the legitimate pay and benefits stuff, which contract are you talking about? Are you talking about Daniel Kottke? Are there details about the contract in the book - I didn't see any. Daniel Kottke was *expecting* to get stocks because he was one of the "founders", but he did not have "skin in the game". He was a contractor, in it for the money. I can see why Steve did what he did.

And on the musing to the third party, would you rather Steve was dishonest to his soulmate? Tell W Isaacson in private and shock Laurene when she finally saw it in the book? Of course, I don't believe Laurene would be shocked either way.


Monica What a great review, Lynne. As always, sharp, catching, and attentive to the details that really matter. I especially liked your personal remarks in the end. It's hard to say if Steve would have approved... but I certainly did! ;-)


message 18: by Lucas (new)

Lucas Teo It's a package and I am so glad many under him accepted the package though not happy about it. Ultimately, they appreciate him and glad to be part of the journey with this crazy genius.


message 19: by K. (new) - added it

K. Might I recommend everyone read some Atlas Shrugged. Nuff said.


Lynne Spreen Kelly, I did. I discovered Atlas Shrugged in my teens, and it was a lifeline for me. I think I must have reread it a dozen times (although I admit I never got through the lecture about the dollar). Although as a political moderate I disagree with Rand's pure objectivism, I still took away a terrific lesson: the sanction of the victim. (I think this is why I've always loved the last thing said by the computer in War Games: the only way to win is not to play.)


Lynne Spreen Thanks, David. I think the book was well worth my time, warts and all. I think you'll be glad you read the whole thing. And Jobs was just a man with all the glory and difficulty that implies, but unlike most of us mortals he had a genius streak.


message 22: by Jim (new) - added it

Jim Just got the book (31 May 2014) - This is a brilliant review - and piece of writing - read as I sit in a garden in Yorkshire England (I'm Scottish!) - Thank You - Jim


Lynne Spreen Thanks, Jim, nice of you to say so. He was one in a million, literally. And Isaacson did a brilliant job of profiling the guy. BTW, the comments in this thread are a great read in themselves. Wonderful discussion. I originally posted the review in 2011 and the discussion continues, to my delight. Enjoyed hearing of your reading spot. Sounds perfect.


message 24: by Lynne (last edited Jan 01, 2015 06:34AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Lynne Spreen Monica wrote: "What a great review, Lynne. As always, sharp, catching, and attentive to the details that really matter. I especially liked your personal remarks in the end. It's hard to say if Steve would have ap..." Monica, I just saw this and wanted to thank you for your kind comment. Happy New Year!


message 25: by Robert (new)

Robert the jerk part surprised me too. Problem is I still like him. What does that say about me? In touch with my dark side…. a little.


Lynne Spreen Robert wrote: "the jerk part surprised me too. Problem is I still like him..." Me, too, Robert. Steve Jobs was flawed, but who isn't? In the end, I mostly feel compassion for him, and gratitude for his amazing contributions to the world.


Anand Krishnakumar But after all, everything he did was to help make the world a better place.


Bharath Kamath No amount of personal success can vindicate his character flaws, but his design philosophy of creating quality products so intuitive to operate that they do not require a user manual is something i really took away from this book.

What led me to this book was Walter Isaacson's bio on Einstein. He is an amazing and balanced biographer.


Lynne Spreen Bharath wrote: "No amount of personal success can vindicate his character flaws, but..."Well said, Bharath, on all points.


Susan (the other Susan) His last words: "Wow...Wow." That chapter brought me to tears.


message 33: by Lynne (last edited Apr 25, 2017 05:49AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Lynne Spreen Susan (the other Susan) wrote: "His last words: "Wow...Wow." That chapter brought me to tears." I know. Me, too. In the 5 years since I wrote this review, I've thought of it and spoken of it often.


message 34: by Indy (new)

Indy Quillen As overbearing as the man was, he still inspires me today. Great review, Lynne!


message 35: by George (new)

George Gurney I've not read the book, but have read other things about him, and saw the movie. The last line you referred to, I see in your writing about Karen Grace (who is a personification of you in ways). I can't accept the way Jobs treated people...on purpose to get them to do what he wanted. It is never okay to bully people to distraction, no matter how brilliant your mind may be.


fosdai18nau 😉😣😉😂😐😑😑


message 37: by George (new)

George Gurney I have re-read all the comments above, and find my own from last April. I am impressed with all the wisdom of the respondents and the caring about how people are treated. Reading through these, I'm reminded of Howard Hughes who was in many ways that same kind of genius in certain areas, but treated people very badly. It has been said that on the cusp of genius, there is the possibility of insanity, which I think Hughes was much closer to. Of course, helped by the drugs. Makes one wonder how close Edison came to that point.


message 38: by Paca (new) - rated it 5 stars

Paca Great review and captured my thoughts exactly


message 39: by MUHAMMAD (new)

MUHAMMAD NAEEM Nice book thepdf.online


back to top