Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Page 27
... effect is independent of the spin of the incident particle ( the M ( △ , s ) operator does not act on spin quantum numbers . ) All the other spin effects are presumably not important . ( iii ) Calculations such as the one above , as ...
... effect is independent of the spin of the incident particle ( the M ( △ , s ) operator does not act on spin quantum numbers . ) All the other spin effects are presumably not important . ( iii ) Calculations such as the one above , as ...
Page 35
... effects dis- appear . Let us take , e.g. , two such states and give them the same momentum p . Then their energies differ : E - E * = √p2 + M2 − √p2 + M * 2 p large M2 - M * 2 2p ( The only important thing in these approximations is ...
... effects dis- appear . Let us take , e.g. , two such states and give them the same momentum p . Then their energies differ : E - E * = √p2 + M2 − √p2 + M * 2 p large M2 - M * 2 2p ( The only important thing in these approximations is ...
Page 58
... effects which do not depend dramatically on A = 0 . Let us go back , however , to the case A = 0 and discuss some recent experiments in which . → 3 ′′ and π → ɔ̃π processes were measured on various nuclear targets . ( A very rich ...
... effects which do not depend dramatically on A = 0 . Let us go back , however , to the case A = 0 and discuss some recent experiments in which . → 3 ′′ and π → ɔ̃π processes were measured on various nuclear targets . ( A very rich ...
Page 61
... effects . ( Note that we are working in the high energy limit , hence our arguments are based on the assumption that the absorption properties of the objects produced are the same in this limit as at the experimentally available ...
... effects . ( Note that we are working in the high energy limit , hence our arguments are based on the assumption that the absorption properties of the objects produced are the same in this limit as at the experimentally available ...
Page 62
... effect , let us consider an example of a two component system ( such as was described before , e.g. , by eq ( 5.6 ) ) penetrating a piece of nuclear matter . The following remark about penetration through a sequence of thin slabs of ...
... effect , let us consider an example of a two component system ( such as was described before , e.g. , by eq ( 5.6 ) ) penetrating a piece of nuclear matter . The following remark about penetration through a sequence of thin slabs of ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity of phase anomalous magnetic moment ú approximately assume attenuation b+½s beam Bureau of Standards coherent diffractive production collision Compton scattering compute Coulomb interactions Czyż d³r db exp i▲·b deuteron diagonalization diffractive production processes diffractive scattering discussed double scattering elastic scattering amplitude electromagnetic equation example excited experiments factor Feynman diagrams formula four-momentum Glauber model hadrons Hence high energy limit incident particle incident wave inelastic shadowing Interactions of High invariant mass K mesons multiple scattering National Bureau neutrino neutrons ññ Note nuclear matter nuclear targets nuclei nucleon obtained optical theorem parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction of vector physical pion production amplitude profiles quantum numbers regeneration Řº shadowing effects single scattering spin strongly interacting target nucleus total cross section vector meson VMD model wave function γν Σ Σ