| Helga Haftendorn - 1996 - 468 pages
...from the Ministerial Guidance. This tacking by the USA was apparently a result of differences between the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense, especially as it was intimated that the JCS were prepared to accept the current draft. The... | |
| John M. Clearwater - 1996 - 262 pages
...became the SALT talks. 442 Walt Rostow notes that the "upshot (of the meeting) was a compromise" between the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense. 443 McNamara got the go-ahead for negotiations, and the Chiefs got some monies appropriated... | |
| Eleanor Chelimsky, William R. Shadish - 1997 - 560 pages
...Control and Disarmament Agency; the Institute for Defense Analyses, the Center for Naval Analyses; the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense; the Defense Nuclear, Defense Mapping, and Defense Communications Agencies; the Congressional... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services - 1997 - 998 pages
...warhead and launcher numbers. We have made input on our warfighting requirements through the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense. REDUCTION OF TRIAD TO ONE OR TWO LEGS Senator KEMPTHORNE. General Habiger, if a START III... | |
| United States. General Accounting Office - 1998 - 72 pages
...organize, train, and equip their forces under title 10 of the US Code. Officials in both the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense view their own role in determining weapon requirements and acquisition programs only as advisory.... | |
| Sean Kay - 1998 - 226 pages
...PFP was the result of considerable interagency review in Washington, the primary impetus came from the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense. 24. William Drozdiak, "NATO Balks at Opening Pact to E. Europe," Washington Post, 1 September... | |
| United States. General Accounting Office - 2000 - 32 pages
...trade-offs, and explore alternatives. In 1998, however, we reported that officials in both the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Office of the Secretary of Defense view their roles as members of these organizations in determining weapon requirements as only... | |
| |