Athenian DemocracyP. J. Rhodes Edinburgh University Press, 2019 M08 7 - 304 pages Athens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty meant above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of the male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German and French scholarship on its origins, theory and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the manoeuvrings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyse a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archaeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 66
Page 33
... source had additional material about the Kleisthenic period – dates, detail about the tribal reforms, the Leipsydrion skolion – which he incorporated into a basically Herodotean narrative. The same is evidently the case for the motif of ...
... source had additional material about the Kleisthenic period – dates, detail about the tribal reforms, the Leipsydrion skolion – which he incorporated into a basically Herodotean narrative. The same is evidently the case for the motif of ...
Page 35
... source adds that about 5000 persons would have been disfranchised had the proposal gone through, as it evidently did not.72 (3) In the same context a decree of Thrasyboulos offered citizenship 'to all those who had come down together ...
... source adds that about 5000 persons would have been disfranchised had the proposal gone through, as it evidently did not.72 (3) In the same context a decree of Thrasyboulos offered citizenship 'to all those who had come down together ...
Page 41
... sources. If the scanty evidence, however, is combined with an a priori [from cause to effect] argument, it should be possible to reconstruct a fairly reliable picture of how the Athenians passed their decrees and elected their officials ...
... sources. If the scanty evidence, however, is combined with an a priori [from cause to effect] argument, it should be possible to reconstruct a fairly reliable picture of how the Athenians passed their decrees and elected their officials ...
Page 42
... source is Arist. Ath. Pol. 30.5, a paper constitution of 411 b.c. prescribing that a board of five councillors chosen ... sources state that the vote was conducted and the show of hands assessed by this board of councillors (Aeschin. 3.3 ...
... source is Arist. Ath. Pol. 30.5, a paper constitution of 411 b.c. prescribing that a board of five councillors chosen ... sources state that the vote was conducted and the show of hands assessed by this board of councillors (Aeschin. 3.3 ...
Page 43
... source which can be cited is a note on the lemma [phrase commented on] κατεχειροτνησεν αυτου :8 αντ του κατεψηφσατο αυτου . καταχειροτονα δ κα αποχειροτονα διαφρει. καταχειροτονα μν γα``ρ εγνετο ουτω . ελεγεν κηρυξ· τ Μειδα δοκει ...
... source which can be cited is a note on the lemma [phrase commented on] κατεχειροτνησεν αυτου :8 αντ του κατεψηφσατο αυτου . καταχειροτονα δ κα αποχειροτονα διαφρει. καταχειροτονα μν γα``ρ εγνετο ουτω . ελεγεν κηρυξ· τ Μειδα δοκει ...
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
PART II POLITICAL ACTIVITY | 159 |
PART III MOMENTS IN HISTORY | 237 |
PART IV A VIEW OF DEMOCRACY | 325 |
Intellectual Chronology | 349 |
Bibliography | 352 |
Index | 356 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity actual allotment ancient archon argues Aristotle assembly Athenian Athens attempt barley called citizens classical Cleisthenes competition Constitution Council count courts decision deme democracy democratic demos Demosthenes dikasts discussion doubt eisangelia evidence example fact festival fifth century five four fourth century give given Greek hands Hesperia Hundred IG ii2 important individual institutions interest jury kind kleroteria later leaders least less lines majority means officials originally Oxford particular perhaps period person Plut political poor possible practice present probably problem procedure proposal punishment question reason references reforms regard remained Rhodes rooms says seems Solon sources speech suggests taken tickets tribe University vote whole