Part 5, Impact Aid: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, First Session on H.R. 15 to Extend for Five Years Certain Elementary, Secondary, and Other Education Programs, Hearings Held in Washington, D.C. ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977 - 1076 pages |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 22
Prorations were necessary in fiscal years 1951 and 1955 and in every year since fiscal year 1967. However , even under conservatvie assumptions concerning loss of aid , our analysis showed that most LEAs would not have to impose major ...
Prorations were necessary in fiscal years 1951 and 1955 and in every year since fiscal year 1967. However , even under conservatvie assumptions concerning loss of aid , our analysis showed that most LEAs would not have to impose major ...
Page 46
I have strictly a draft at this point in time of the formula by which BIA was going to evaluate the resources and the basic level that was necessary to — the resources which were necessary to meet the basic level of education .
I have strictly a draft at this point in time of the formula by which BIA was going to evaluate the resources and the basic level that was necessary to — the resources which were necessary to meet the basic level of education .
Page 76
... or two days during the year , while others use an average daily membership figure . Still others use different methods for computing ADA . Computation of LEA ADA GAO found that many LEA's did not make the necessary adjustment for ...
... or two days during the year , while others use an average daily membership figure . Still others use different methods for computing ADA . Computation of LEA ADA GAO found that many LEA's did not make the necessary adjustment for ...
Page 89
These people would have to assume the burden , these people would have to vote the tax increase that would be necessary if impact aid were lost . Now , in regard to the program itself , I have a few points that I would like to mention .
These people would have to assume the burden , these people would have to vote the tax increase that would be necessary if impact aid were lost . Now , in regard to the program itself , I have a few points that I would like to mention .
Page 90
We understand the necessary consideration for reauthorization of the legislation . But , we would say with regard to phasing out , the answer is very simple . If you want to phase out impact aid , cut down Federal activity .
We understand the necessary consideration for reauthorization of the legislation . But , we would say with regard to phasing out , the answer is very simple . If you want to phase out impact aid , cut down Federal activity .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activities additional administration amended amount applicant appropriate approved assistance attendance authorized average basic basis budget buildings Chairman child Commissioner comparable computing Congress considered construction cost County Department determined Difference disaster disparity educational agency effect Elementary eligible entitled equalization estimated expenditures Federal property federally connected final fiscal Force free public education funds Government housing impact aid increase Indian instructions LEAs less local educational agency located major means meet ment military million necessary Office of Education operation paragraph parent payments percent percentage present priority problem proposed Public Law pupil reasonable received regulations represent request reside respect responsibility result revenues school district school facilities situation sources standard Stat statement subsection term tion Title United