Trade in Food: Regulatory and Judicial Approaches in the EC and the WTOCameron May, 2007 - 540 pages Trade in Food surveys and explores the evolution of the European Community's regulation of food within the broader framework set out by the WTO Agreements. Its main purpose is to provide readers keen to deepen their knowledge of the field with easy access to the EC and WTO food laws accompanied by a critical explanation and commentary. The book is suitable for legal practitioners, judges, policy-makers, officials of international organizations as well as post graduate students of international trade law and policy, international and European economic law, global administrative law and risk regulation. |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 86
Page 41
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 43
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 45
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 46
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 54
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
Foreword | 15 |
Introduction | 37 |
4 | 61 |
1 | 77 |
Risk Communication | 78 |
2 | 83 |
within the | 100 |
The Pfizer Judgment | 130 |
31 | 325 |
Introduction | 327 |
6 | 361 |
1 | 367 |
Comparing Food Safety Risk Analysis Schemes | 387 |
The Integration of Other Legitimate Factors into the EC and | 395 |
What Role for the Precautionary Principle? | 407 |
Conclusions | 417 |
Recent Case Law | 134 |
the Courts the Challenge of Reviewing | 141 |
The European Food Safety Authority the Cornerstone | 161 |
the Scientific Point of | 169 |
23 | 170 |
3 | 173 |
C | 175 |
4 | 202 |
1 | 216 |
3 | 217 |
Mutual Recognition and Equivalence | 274 |
Permission for Precautionary Action | 280 |
Notification and Transparency Requirements | 289 |
Risk Regulations in EC and WTO Law | 297 |
1 | 298 |
The WTO and Scientific Justification | 307 |
Why do both the EC and the WTO Rely on Science? | 313 |
The WTO Regulation of Food | 320 |
Comparing Standards of Review | 425 |
A Procedural Intensityvariable Standard of Review for Science | 432 |
Introduction | 439 |
Conclusion | 443 |
Comparing Food Safety Regulatory Frameworks | 476 |
Annex EC | 485 |
1 | 487 |
Annex GATT | 499 |
se EC | 502 |
Historical Background of the GATTWTO Regulation | 517 |
529 | |
531 | |
533 | |
535 | |
537 | |
538 | |
Common terms and phrases
adopted Appellate Body application approach Article 2.2 Article 5.7 assessment and risk Codex Alimentarius Codex Alimentarius Commission Commission consumer contested measure contracting party decision developed dispute EC courts EC food EC institutions EC law EC-Hormones EFSA EFSA's EFTA Court ensure environmental established European Food Safety European Parliament food law food regulation foodstuffs framework GATT genetically modified organisms GMOs guidelines harmonisation Hormones human health international standards international trade issues Journal judicial review justified legislation level of protection organisations Panel Report paragraph particular Pfizer phytosanitary measures precautionary principle procedures public health regime regulatory rely requirements risk analysis model risk assessment risk management Risk Regulation role sanitary and phytosanitary sanitary or phytosanitary science-based measures scientific committees scientific evidence scientific justification scientific opinions scientific uncertainty specific SPS Agreement SPS measures standard of review supra note Treaty World Trade World Trade Organization WTO judicial bodies WTO members