Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 29
Page 11
... given to a good approximation by ekz . Otherwise one should realize that k , depends on d which sits in the Fourier transform of the shadow . Hence , away from the scatterer , one would guess the following shape of the wave ( compare ...
... given to a good approximation by ekz . Otherwise one should realize that k , depends on d which sits in the Fourier transform of the shadow . Hence , away from the scatterer , one would guess the following shape of the wave ( compare ...
Page 12
... given below are interesting also because they may be used to analyze high energy nucleus - nucleus collisions ( which is not an academic problem because there are experimental pro- jects under way ) . The geometry of the process is ...
... given below are interesting also because they may be used to analyze high energy nucleus - nucleus collisions ( which is not an academic problem because there are experimental pro- jects under way ) . The geometry of the process is ...
Page 14
... given by pa ) ( s ( a ) ) and p ( b ) ( s ( b ) ) . If one assumes that y ( b ) is a very narrow function of b ( hence the components of the two hadrons are very small ) we can write * [ [ d3sp ) ( 8 ) p ) ( b + s ) d2g ( a ) ď2s ( b ) ...
... given by pa ) ( s ( a ) ) and p ( b ) ( s ( b ) ) . If one assumes that y ( b ) is a very narrow function of b ( hence the components of the two hadrons are very small ) we can write * [ [ d3sp ) ( 8 ) p ) ( b + s ) d2g ( a ) ď2s ( b ) ...
Page 15
... given above , the droplet model is very crude and I do not want to go beyond this qualitative description . One should perhaps mention at this point that the amplitude ( 3.4 ) contains the geometric shape of the colliding objects ( e.g. ...
... given above , the droplet model is very crude and I do not want to go beyond this qualitative description . One should perhaps mention at this point that the amplitude ( 3.4 ) contains the geometric shape of the colliding objects ( e.g. ...
Page 19
... given by dominating process , but not έ ( b ) ) . If the Coulomb interaction is absent ( x . = 0 ) the elastic cross section is invariant against the change of sign of . If , however , x.0 some drastic changes may be introduced by ...
... given by dominating process , but not έ ( b ) ) . If the Coulomb interaction is absent ( x . = 0 ) the elastic cross section is invariant against the change of sign of . If , however , x.0 some drastic changes may be introduced by ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity of phase anomalous magnetic moment ú approximately assume attenuation b+½s beam Bureau of Standards coherent diffractive production collision Compton scattering compute Coulomb interactions Czyż d³r db exp i▲·b deuteron diagonalization diffractive production processes diffractive scattering discussed double scattering elastic scattering amplitude electromagnetic equation example excited experiments factor Feynman diagrams formula four-momentum Glauber model hadrons Hence high energy limit incident particle incident wave inelastic shadowing Interactions of High invariant mass K mesons multiple scattering National Bureau neutrino neutrons ññ Note nuclear matter nuclear targets nuclei nucleon obtained optical theorem parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction of vector physical pion production amplitude profiles quantum numbers regeneration Řº shadowing effects single scattering spin strongly interacting target nucleus total cross section vector meson VMD model wave function γν Σ Σ