Athenian DemocracyP. J. Rhodes Edinburgh University Press, 2019 M08 7 - 304 pages Athens' democracy developed during the sixth and fifth centuries and continued into the fourth; Athens' defeat by Macedon in 322 began a series of alternations between democracy and oligarchy. The democracy was inseparably bound up with the ideals of liberty and equality, the rule of law, and the direct government of the people by the people. Liberty meant above all freedom of speech, the right to be heard in the public assembly and the right to speak one's mind in private. Equality meant the equal right of the male citizens (perhaps 60,000 in the fifth century, 30,000 in the fourth) to participate in the government of the state and the administration of the law. Disapproved of as mob rule until the nineteenth century, the institutions of Athenian democracy have become an inspiration for modern democratic politics and political philosophy. P. J. Rhodes's reader focuses on the political institutions, political activity, history, and nature of Athenian democracy and introduces some of the best British, American, German and French scholarship on its origins, theory and practice. Part I is devoted to political institutions: citizenship, the assembly, the law-courts, and capital punishment. Part II explores aspects of political activity: the demagogues and their relationship with the assembly, the manoeuvrings of the politicians, competitive festivals, and the separation of public from private life. Part III looks at three crucial points in the development of the democracy: the reforms of Solon, Cleisthenes and Ephialtes. Part IV considers what it was in Greek life that led to the development of democracy. Some of the authors adopt broad-brush approaches to major questions; others analyse a particular body of evidence in detail. Use is made of archaeology, comparison with other societies, the location of festivals in their civic context, and the need to penetrate behind what the classical Athenians made of their past. |
From inside the book
Results 11-15 of 75
Page 48
... courts the votes were always counted with precision, and accordingly we have some information on the exact number of ... court by two votes”]. Only a tie saved Leocrates from a sentence of death (Aeschin. 3.252), and even in inscriptions ...
... courts the votes were always counted with precision, and accordingly we have some information on the exact number of ... court by two votes”]. Only a tie saved Leocrates from a sentence of death (Aeschin. 3.252), and even in inscriptions ...
Page 52
... courts. A politician may sometimes have refused to accept a defeat in the ecclesia because he was suspicious of the proedroi's assessment of the majority, and accordingly he may have found some reason for bringing an indictment against ...
... courts. A politician may sometimes have refused to accept a defeat in the ecclesia because he was suspicious of the proedroi's assessment of the majority, and accordingly he may have found some reason for bringing an indictment against ...
Page 54
... court since Aeschines fifteen years later refers to the institution as a fact (Aeschin. 3.4). The obligation was binding on all members of the phyle attending that particular meeting of the assembly, and it may have entailed a system by ...
... court since Aeschines fifteen years later refers to the institution as a fact (Aeschin. 3.4). The obligation was binding on all members of the phyle attending that particular meeting of the assembly, and it may have entailed a system by ...
Page 58
... the assembly or law-court is (evenly) divided: either it must be resolved by allotment or something else of that kind must be done.” * “Strategoi shall be nominated by the nomophylakes ('law-guardians') from 58 Political Institutions.
... the assembly or law-court is (evenly) divided: either it must be resolved by allotment or something else of that kind must be done.” * “Strategoi shall be nominated by the nomophylakes ('law-guardians') from 58 Political Institutions.
Page 61
... each show of hands regularly is over in less than one minute, a board of ten can, in most cases, be elected in 15–30 minutes. 3 Aristotle, the Kleroteria, and the Courts* STERLING DOW Aristotle How Did the Athenian Ecclesia Vote? 61.
... each show of hands regularly is over in less than one minute, a board of ten can, in most cases, be elected in 15–30 minutes. 3 Aristotle, the Kleroteria, and the Courts* STERLING DOW Aristotle How Did the Athenian Ecclesia Vote? 61.
Contents
1 | |
13 | |
PART II POLITICAL ACTIVITY | 159 |
PART III MOMENTS IN HISTORY | 237 |
PART IV A VIEW OF DEMOCRACY | 325 |
Intellectual Chronology | 349 |
Bibliography | 352 |
Index | 356 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity actual allotment ancient archon argues Aristotle assembly Athenian Athens attempt barley called citizens classical Cleisthenes competition Constitution Council count courts decision deme democracy democratic demos Demosthenes dikasts discussion doubt eisangelia evidence example fact festival fifth century five four fourth century give given Greek hands Hesperia Hundred IG ii2 important individual institutions interest jury kind kleroteria later leaders least less lines majority means officials originally Oxford particular perhaps period person Plut political poor possible practice present probably problem procedure proposal punishment question reason references reforms regard remained Rhodes rooms says seems Solon sources speech suggests taken tickets tribe University vote whole