Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 17
Page 58
... considered in any way for receiving funds as though they were equalized . In the previous discussion it was said that this might be possible . It is my understanding now that the new guidelines would remove that potential . It is such ...
... considered in any way for receiving funds as though they were equalized . In the previous discussion it was said that this might be possible . It is my understanding now that the new guidelines would remove that potential . It is such ...
Page 59
... considered as a major justification for the major surgery that they recommend . We have always been tarred with the brush of Washington , D.C. This Nation only has one National Capital . There are only a few school districts around here ...
... considered as a major justification for the major surgery that they recommend . We have always been tarred with the brush of Washington , D.C. This Nation only has one National Capital . There are only a few school districts around here ...
Page 78
... considered by your Committee and by the conferees , it was our understanding that your intent was to allow states to consider impact aid payments to LEAs in the context of equalization programs which reflect the relative need and re ...
... considered by your Committee and by the conferees , it was our understanding that your intent was to allow states to consider impact aid payments to LEAs in the context of equalization programs which reflect the relative need and re ...
Page 79
... considered . However , the use of the 20 % standard could mean that OE would allow impact aid payments to be considered in a state with a 20 % varia- tion and not at all in a state with a 21 % variation . This does not make much sense ...
... considered . However , the use of the 20 % standard could mean that OE would allow impact aid payments to be considered in a state with a 20 % varia- tion and not at all in a state with a 21 % variation . This does not make much sense ...
Page 123
... considered . When the public housing students have been dealt with separately in the past , funds have not been forth- coming . Though eligible for funding since 1970 , in actuality no payments have been made because of a lack of ...
... considered . When the public housing students have been dealt with separately in the past , funds have not been forth- coming . Though eligible for funding since 1970 , in actuality no payments have been made because of a lack of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
25 percent amount appropriation average BELL bill Brevard County budget Chairman PERKINS CHISHOLM City School Commissioner committee concept paper Congress congressional cost of education DAVID FISH debt service District Old law educational agencies effect Elementary eligible entitlement equalization formula expenditures fiscal year 1976 FISH FORD Fort Benning Fremont County going GOODLING handicapped children High School hold-harmless provisions Husk impact aid program Independent School law New law law tier leeway legislation low-rent housing MEEDS ment military Montgomery County MONTGOMERY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of Education Okaloosa County Onslow County payments Phenix City Prince Georges County problem proposal public housing pupils public housing students Public Law 874 Public Schools qualify question QUIE receive reduction on TCE revenue Russell County School District school systems statement STORMER testimony Thank tier 2 Difference tion trict Unified School District York City