Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 26
... conclude that Ms. West's petition does not identify any factual or legal errors or any policy considerations or exercises of discretion that warrant review . Her petition is therefore denied.2 Phillips Petition : VDAPC received a copy ...
... conclude that Ms. West's petition does not identify any factual or legal errors or any policy considerations or exercises of discretion that warrant review . Her petition is therefore denied.2 Phillips Petition : VDAPC received a copy ...
Page 28
... concluding that the permit is unlawful , petitioner's concern about federal enforceability does not provide any ... conclude that Mr. Phillips ' petition does not identify any factual or legal errors or any policy considerations or ...
... concluding that the permit is unlawful , petitioner's concern about federal enforceability does not provide any ... conclude that Mr. Phillips ' petition does not identify any factual or legal errors or any policy considerations or ...
Page 44
... conclude that MAC has not met its burden of identifying a clear factual or legal error or a policy consideration or ... concluded that no takings claim was ripe because the Rybacheks had not claimed that a particular piece of their ...
... conclude that MAC has not met its burden of identifying a clear factual or legal error or a policy consideration or ... concluded that no takings claim was ripe because the Rybacheks had not claimed that a particular piece of their ...
Page 51
... conclude that review should be granted on this issue to further explore this question . A briefing schedule is set out in the conclusion below . III . CONCLUSION In sum , we conclude that one of the issues raised in MAC's appeal should ...
... conclude that review should be granted on this issue to further explore this question . A briefing schedule is set out in the conclusion below . III . CONCLUSION In sum , we conclude that one of the issues raised in MAC's appeal should ...
Page 58
... conclude that any decisions regarding the location of , or the Region's participa- tion in , the public hearing were influenced by Mr. Breitlow's subse- quent employment contacts with CWM . Moreover , the record on ap- peal indicates ...
... conclude that any decisions regarding the location of , or the Region's participa- tion in , the public hearing were influenced by Mr. Breitlow's subse- quent employment contacts with CWM . Moreover , the record on ap- peal indicates ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged EAJA effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego
Popular passages
Page 354 - ... (A) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness; or (B) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of. or otherwise managed.
Page 633 - First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.
Page 525 - If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action.
Page 331 - ... records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information...
Page 288 - best available control technology" means an emission limitation based on the maximum degree of reduction of each pollutant subject to regulation under this Act emitted from or which results from any major emitting facility, which the permitting authority, on a case-by-case basis, taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts and other costs, determines is achievable for such...
Page 531 - Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish, or (2) accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to either validity or amount, is not admissible to prove liability for or in validity of the claim or its amount.
Page 607 - A thing is deemed to be affixed to land when it is attached to it by roots, as in the case of trees, vines, or shrubs; or imbedded in it, as in case of walls; or permanently resting upon it, as in the case of buildings; or permanently attached to what is thus permanent, as by means of cement, plaster, nails, bolts, or screws.
Page 56 - An employee shall avoid any action, whether or not specifically prohibited by this subpart, which might result in, or create the appearance of: (1) Using public office for private gain; (2) Giving preferential treatment to any person; (3) Impeding Government efficiency or economy; (4) Losing complete independence or impartiality; (5) Making a Government decision outside official channels; or (6) Affecting adversely the confidence of the public in the integrity of the Government.
Page 265 - ... In any case where the owner or operator of such facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Federal Land Manager, and the Federal Land Manager so certifies, that the emissions from such facility will have no adverse impact on the air quality-related values of such lands (including visibility) notwithstanding the fact that the change in air quality resulting from emissions from such facility will cause or contribute to concentrations which exceed the maximum allowable increases for class...
Page 327 - No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains, unless disclosure of the record would be...