Interactions of High Energy Particles with NucleiNational Bureau of Standards, 1975 - 69 pages |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 30
Page 9
... Note that eq ( 2.6 ) gives the same relation between magnetic moment and spin when x = 1 ! So , in both Examples , when к and ĩ are chosen to make eq ( 2.7 ) valid , the spin states decouple in the high energy limit . In order to make ...
... Note that eq ( 2.6 ) gives the same relation between magnetic moment and spin when x = 1 ! So , in both Examples , when к and ĩ are chosen to make eq ( 2.7 ) valid , the spin states decouple in the high energy limit . In order to make ...
Page 11
... Note that ( 3.1 ) gives , as r → ∞ , ( compare D. R. Yennie article in [ S3 ] ) ¥ ( r ) = eik2 + [ ƒ ( ke1 ) / r ] exp ( ikr ) , ( e = component of re2 ) , with f ( ke ) correctly given by the inverse of y ( b ) . One can see this by ...
... Note that ( 3.1 ) gives , as r → ∞ , ( compare D. R. Yennie article in [ S3 ] ) ¥ ( r ) = eik2 + [ ƒ ( ke1 ) / r ] exp ( ikr ) , ( e = component of re2 ) , with f ( ke ) correctly given by the inverse of y ( b ) . One can see this by ...
Page 13
... note that ( 3.2 ) is a sum rule . For instance , we can extract from ( 3.2 ) the following contribution of the second order because [ d3r , ®po® • ( r , ® ) ¥ u ( b − s , ® + 81® ) ) 2ı ( b − 8 , +82 ) ) % ( rz ) = = ( b ) [ dar ...
... note that ( 3.2 ) is a sum rule . For instance , we can extract from ( 3.2 ) the following contribution of the second order because [ d3r , ®po® • ( r , ® ) ¥ u ( b − s , ® + 81® ) ) 2ı ( b − 8 , +82 ) ) % ( rz ) = = ( b ) [ dar ...
Page 18
... notes we gave some examples of such cases . To analyze this problem in more detail , one has to link it with diffractive production processes and we shall postpone such a discussion until our analysis of such processes . Here , let us ...
... notes we gave some examples of such cases . To analyze this problem in more detail , one has to link it with diffractive production processes and we shall postpone such a discussion until our analysis of such processes . Here , let us ...
Page 20
... Note that dz lim xa ( b ) = v Ze2 [ ** def d''PA ( 1 ) Hence , for large b , xc ( b ) → xc2 ( b ) and the integral for M converges . Let us construct x . ( b ) in the case of A large ( a large target nucleus ) . We assume ( for the ...
... Note that dz lim xa ( b ) = v Ze2 [ ** def d''PA ( 1 ) Hence , for large b , xc ( b ) → xc2 ( b ) and the integral for M converges . Let us construct x . ( b ) in the case of A large ( a large target nucleus ) . We assume ( for the ...
Common terms and phrases
absorption additivity of phase anomalous magnetic moment ú approximately assume attenuation b+½s beam Bureau of Standards coherent diffractive production collision Compton scattering compute Coulomb interactions Czyż d³r db exp i▲·b deuteron diagonalization diffractive production processes diffractive scattering discussed double scattering elastic scattering amplitude electromagnetic equation example excited experiments factor Feynman diagrams formula four-momentum Glauber model hadrons Hence high energy limit incident particle incident wave inelastic shadowing Interactions of High invariant mass K mesons multiple scattering National Bureau neutrino neutrons ññ Note nuclear matter nuclear targets nuclei nucleon obtained optical theorem parameters phase shifts photon photoproduction of vector physical pion production amplitude profiles quantum numbers regeneration Řº shadowing effects single scattering spin strongly interacting target nucleus total cross section vector meson VMD model wave function γν Σ Σ