Page images

program will provide commercially unavailable compounds to researchers while investigators will also study known products for their efficacy in unusual applications.

The Centers for Basic Neuroscience Research program promotes the integration of basic and clinical neuroscience strategies for studying schizophrenia and other severe mental disorders. This program was announced to the field in 1990. NIMH received a strong response and currently has 10 applications under review.

National Leadership and Information Dissemination. NIMH and the NAS/IOM held a 2-day International Neuroscience Symposium to highlight 1990 as the beginning of the Decade of the Brain. Renowned brain scientists, other prominent scientists, members of the Administration and Congress, and the public were invited to this commemorative symposium. The presentations will be published as the Decade of the Brain commemorative monograph.

NIMH will co-sponsor with the Fidia Research Foundation a second symposium, "The Centennial of the Neuron," to be held at the National Academy of Sciences Great Hall in Washington, D.C. on June 23-25, 1991. This meeting will feature presentations by an outstanding international roster of neuroscientists who have made seminal contributions to our understanding of the neuron and its functions. Major topical areas include advances in developmental neurobiology; signaling in neuronal function; neurotransmitter biosynthesis and function; and regulation and pharmacology of transmitter receptors.

In collaboration with with the Library of Congress, NIMH is sponsoring the Decade of the Brain Lecture Series for the general public and the Congress on scientific, philosophical, ethical, and policy issues related to brain research. The first of these meetings, to be held on July 24, 1991, will include three presentations that focus, respectively, on brain imaging, on how the brain generates mind, and on current cutting-edge concepts in neurobiology, computer science, and human cognition. The first public lecture in this series is scheduled to be held in the Fall, and in March 1992 a major symposium is planned on ethical implications of neuroscience research.



Question. I was recently visited by representatives of New Hampshire's Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention program who raised concerns over the amount of time necessary to gather information and prepare a block grant application. The "Notification to Respondent of Estimated Burden" provided by ADAMHA as part of the Block Grant guidelines (copy attached) estimates the information collection requirement to average 400 hours per application. This is a tremendous burden, both in terms of manpower and cost for a small State like New Hampshire; 400 hours means that it will take one individual ten 40-hour weeks to simply apply for federal block grant funding.

What is ADAMHA doing to reduce this paperwork burden and minimize the amount of time necessary to complete a grant application?

Answer. The 400 hour estimate represents an average of all reporting units consisting of awards from $59 thousand to $151 million. Because the reporting requirements are intended to establish how the State spent their award and what their treatment needs are, the actual report preparation time will vary in direct proportion to the size of each State's award. New Hampshire, receiving a smaller award, should expect to spend considerably less time on the report. Costs associated with this paperwork burden are supported by the administrative cost allowance in the ADMS block grant.

We are sensitive to reducing the reporting requirements and have taken or shall be taking the following steps: setting page limits on all narratives and rearranging the voluntary State Plan to offset major requirements of the annual report.

Question. Can information collection requirements imposed by ADAMHA on the States be reduced administratively or are they the result of legislative mandate?

Answer. The information collection requirements could be administratively reduced by ADAMHA; however, prudent Federal management of the ADMS Block Grant dictates that a minimal data set on State's activities and plans be compiled. The voluntary combined State Application and Plan, in the main, focuses on the compliance issues of Section 1916 of the Public Health Service Act, and the responsibilities of the Secretary in Sections 1917 and 1918. In addition, the data are necessary for the DHHS to be in compliance with the Federal Financial Manager Integrity Act.

The data being collected from the States describe how the money was spent and how many people are in need of services supported by the Block Grant. Our failure to have had this most basic information the past has led to wide criticism from Congress, GAO, and the DHHS Inspector General.

Question. Last year, New Hampshire Alcohol and Drug Abuse completed nine different needs assessment surveys on training which were generated by the Office of Substance Abuse and Prevention. Many of these surveys requested the same basic information but they were prepared by the different contractors and used somewhat different formats.

States are being urged to collaborate and cooperate; yet it appears this message is not being followed at the federal level. What can ADAMHA do to reduce overlap and the collection of duplicative information being requested of our State programs?


Answer. In developing and implementing a fully comprehensive training program, OSAP has undertaken a large, global needs assessment survey intended to assess the training needs for a variety of interrelated though diverse populations such as health professionals, allied health professionals, preventionists, social workers, community coalition members, parents, and others. of the distinctness of each of these populations, it has been necessary for OSAP contractors to query States for information specific to the populations each OSAP initiative is intended to address. While this may appear as multiple requests to the States, all inquiries are, in fact, part of a larger needs assessment survey. Effort is made within OSAP to share information among the program initiatives in order to limit the burden placed on the States for information.


Question. The National Advisory Mental Health Council will shortly release a report on a National Plan of Research to Improve Care for Severe Mental Disorders. Can you provide a preview of the recommendations contained in this plan?

Answer. We are very excited about the promise of the new research field developed in this plan. With the help of three panels of experts, and many consultants throughout the Nation, this Council Report has formulated recommendations that lay the basis for a new effort to bring the full power of scientific research to the quest for improved services for the millions of people with severe, persistent, disabling mental disorders. Specific focuses of the plan


Improving quality of care. Research is needed on methods to: (a) improve diagnosis and assessment of rehabilitation potential for mentally ill individuals; (b) apply treatment and rehabilitation in the most effective ways in daily clinical settings; and (c) assure that state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment is available to everyone who needs mental health services. Special emphasis is placed on how best to combine medication, psychosocial treatments, and rehabilitation methods into effective treatment plans for each individual, that are consistent with consumer and family goals while accounting for variations in culture and personal characteristics. Investigators must develop measures of outcome that do justice to the full range of desired effects, from clinical and rehabilitation goals to the fundamental question of improving the quality of life for people with these disorders.

Improving organization and financing of services. Public mental health and other necessary services may be delivered through a confusing maze of bureaucracies. Finding ways to deliver comprehensive, community-based services in an efficient, equitable way, to guarantee access to all who need them with proper concern for dignity and personal needs and desires, is a challenge. Finding ways to provide the needed services economically, assuring that money invested is well spent, and providing adequate financing, is another. The proper role of the judicial and correctional system in providing care to mentally ill offenders and the best uses of coercive treatments, such as outpatient services, are specific areas of interest in the law and mental health. Strategies for overcoming the terrible stigma accompanying these disorders also need to be tested and applied.

Identifying research strategies and issues. The Report has identified a number of ways that research capacity can be developed, including efforts to increase research training. One important need is to enhance the use of research demonstrations, especially controlled, multi-site demonstration projects such as are used in other fields of health care. Another area of the highest priority is to find better ways to apply the results of research, and we are establishing a Task Force on Knowledge Exchange to conduct this effort.

Question. Please provide an update on your implementation of the National Plan for Research on Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders.

Answer. Specific action steps are being taken for the implementation of the National Plan. In order to more accurately determine the incidence, prevalence, and range of child and adolescent mental disorders, a multisite methodologic study is in progress that is providing information on how best to implement a nation-wide epidemiologic survey. Information from this current study will form the basis of a much larger, developmental epidemiologic survey of child and adolescent mental disorders, envisioned to begin in 1994. NIMH has also begun steps to initiate a multicenter collaborative treatment study of disruptive behavior disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, one of the most common and disabling childhood mental disorders. The determination of effective treatments and service systems for these children and adolescents will have important longer-term effects for a substantial portion of children who are under-, ineffectively, or untreated and who may go on to develop significant problems with substance abuse, delinquency, or adult vocational disability.

NIMH is currently preparing to release a major new Program Announcement to coordinate and link efforts to develop the child and adolescent disorders research areas entitled, Implementation of the National Plan for Research on Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders. Additional activities in this coming year include a workshop to teach young or prospective investigators how to submit grants, a meeting of journal editors who impact on this field, and a conference cosponsored with other Federal funding agencies and private foundations to stimulate cooperation between Federal and private sources of funding.

Question. How do these two new research plans interface with the your ongoing blueprints for the Decade of the Brain and Schizophrenia research?

Answer. These two new research plans interface in numerous ways with The National Plan for Research on Schizophrenia and the Brain (combining the Decade of the Brain and Schizophrenia Plans) and The National Plan for Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders. These initiatives complement one another and take advantage of the process and content involved in the development of each.

The interface of the child and adolescent research blueprint and the Decade of the Brain plan is significant because the Decade of the Brain plan includes no specific plans for research on development and maturation of the brain, studies which may lead to the understanding of the etiology of mental illnesses in the early period of life. Research on the complex origins of child and adolescent mental disorders--particularly studies focusing on developmental neurobiology and the genetic control of nervous system development-is likely to clarify the biological foundations of many mental disorders that primarily affect adults, including schizophrenia. Efforts at early detection and treatment of psychopathology in young children, especially through longitudinal studies, may reveal risk factors for and predictors of disorders such as schizophrenia prior to the onset of clinical illness.

Conversely, research focused on the neuroscience of mental disorders has practical application for disorders affecting all ages and understanding the causes and treatment of disorders found primarily among adults will provide invaluable fundamental insights, technological advances, and treatment approaches that can be applied to research and clinical care with younger populations. Thus, we expect these major NIMH research initiatives to have synergistic effects in attracting talented researchers to the mental health field and in stimulating new ways to understand and overcome mental disorders in people of all ages.

Improvement in services for the severely mentally ill may be dependent on new findings in basic or clinic research. Basic research interacts directly with clinical research and vice versa. The indirect impact of the Decade of Brain plan and the Child and Adolescent Plan on the service plan is through clinical research findings, based on basic research findings translated into better treatment for mental illnesses. Although The National Plan of Research to Improve Care for Severe Mental Disorders was developed as a direct extension of the National Plan for Schizophrenia Research, the research results and services improvements it promises will also be applied to children and adolescents where appropriate. The National Advisory Mental Health Council systematically reviewed the state of knowledge and formulated recommendations to build the services research field. The recommendations of The National Plan of Research to Improve Care for Severe Mental Disorders will build on the base of research in basic and clinical research laid out in the earlier plans, and extend them in the area of finding better ways to deliver needed mental health services.

« PreviousContinue »