Arms Control by Committee: Managing Negotiations with the RussiansStanford University Press, 1992 - 349 pages This book is essentially a series of case histories of U.S.-Soviet nuclear arms control negotiations, as seen from the American side. It describes the processes of governmental decisionmaking for arms control in Washington, D.C., and the techniques for joint U.S.-Soviet decisionmaking at the negotiating table. As general counsel of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and member of U.S. delegations to disarmament conferences for eight years, the author was in a unique position to assess the difficulties of fashioning an arms control treaty that could pass muster within the executive branch of the U.S. government, be approved by U.S. allies, be successfully negotiated with the Soviets, and then win the approval of the U.S. Senate. This process will be even more complex now that the United States will face at least four nuclear powers from the former U.S.S.R. The book has three purposes. The first is to add to the recorded history of the following negotiations: the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963, the Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968, the ABM Treaty of 1972 and its companion SALT Interim Agreements, and the 1987 INF Treaty. The author asks in each case, What did the president and his assistants do (or fail to do) to negotiate a successful agreement? The second purpose is to use the case book approach, common in law schools and business schools, as a teaching device for those who wish to learn how the American government made decisions about arms control negotiations, how U.S.-Soviet negotiators reached decisions, and what the results of the decisions have been. The book's third purpose is to generalize about what works and what does not work in the complex world of arms control negotiations, including information on the impact of negotiating committees and comparisons of the process for negotiating arms control treaties with that for achieving arms limits through action and reaction, without written agreement. The concluding chapter looks to the future: What changes will occur in the arms control process given the end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet Union? |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 85
... Soviets ? Question 4 : What effect did the president's reputation for ... Soviet gain is our loss . This school gave priority over negotia- tions to ... Union and their acute mutual distrust , each superpower understandably has a ...
... Soviet Union and the United States were required to cooperate because both their coun- tries could be destroyed in a nuclear exchange , the kind of war neither could win . They believed that arms control could make " the pie " big- ger ...
Managing Negotiations with the Russians. the Soviet Union . This was the first Soviet acceptance of control posts on their soil to monitor an end to testing as a " partial measure " sepa- rate from disarmament.3 At first supportive of ...
... Soviet Union.7 Based on these recommendations , Eisenhower responded to the So- viet initiative by proposing that an international conference of experts meet at Geneva to assess the technical requirements for verifying a ban on nuclear ...
... Soviet soil . Formulating a Position to Serve American Interests in a Split Administration Following Stalin's death in 1953 , Eisenhower had seized several op- portunities to improve relations with the Soviet Union , including the ...
Contents
1 | |
18 | |
The Threshold Test Ban Treaty and Another | 49 |
The NPT Finally Brings Widespread International | 83 |
The ABM Treaty and an Opportunity | 106 |
SALT II Misses an Opportunity to Move | 132 |
The Decisionmaking | 168 |
The Negotiating Process | 200 |
Too Many Cooks? The Impact of the Negotiating | 214 |
Arms Control Without Agreements and | 235 |
Will the Process Change with the End | 255 |
Notes | 271 |
Sources | 315 |
Index | 335 |