Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE II.—Insured unemployment as a percent of average covered employment,

[blocks in formation]

Source: Bureau of Employment Security, U.S. Department of Labor.
TABLE III.-Textile areas of substantial labor surplus

[blocks in formation]

January 1959

Percent

21. 2

11. 3

9.8

6.8

12. 3

11. 9

11. 4

10. 0

6. 2

8.5

11. 3

8.3

9.5

11. 5

12. 9

14. 9

13. 9

11. 3

8. 6

8.7

9.2

9. 6

MIDDLE ATLANTIC

18. 0

15. 0

13. 7

9.0

9. 1

6.9

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Reading (January 1959).

Scranton (January 1959).

Sunbury-Shamokin-Mount Carmel 2 (September 1958).

Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton 2 3 (January 1959).

Williamsport (July 1958).

York (January 1959)...

See footnotes at end of table, p. 576.

10. 1

12.5

11. 4

7.8

16. 8

10. 3

18

12.9

8.7

TABLE III.-Textile areas of substantial labor surplus1 January 1959—Continued

[blocks in formation]

Martinsburg (October 1958).
Parkersburg (December 1958).
North Carolina:

Asheville 23 (January 1959).
Durham 23 (January 1959)
Fayetteville 2 (January 1959).
Hendersonville (January 1959)
Kinston (January 1959).
Lumberton (January 1959)
Mount Airy 2 (January 1959).

Raleigh (January 1959).

Rockingham-Hamlet (January 1959).

Rocky Mount 2 (January 1959).

Rutherfordton-Forest City 2 (January 1959).

Shelby-Kings Mountain 2 (January 1959).

Waynesville 2 (January 1959) – –

Tennessee:

Bristol-Johnson City-Kingsport (September 1958).
Chattanooga 3 (January 1959)..

Knoxville 2 (January 1959)

Memphis (January 1959)

Murfreesboro (April 1958)

Shelbyville (October 1958).

Georgia: Toccoa (September 1958)
Mississippi: Greenville (August 1958).
Alabama:

Alexander City (August 1958)
Anniston (December 1958).

Florence-Sheffield (December 1958)
Gadsden (December 1958) -
Jasper (December 1958).

Percent

13. 2

7.7

10. 2

6. 3

8. 4

8.3

7.4

14

11.9

8.7

12. 1

10.9

6.9

21. 4

10

11

9

6. 2

6. 7

7.3

8. 1

6. 7

11. 2

8. 7

6.9

8. 1

11.5

8.6

10. 5

7.2

10. 8

Talladega (December 1958).

WEST

Oregon: Pendleton (November 1958).

9.9

8. 2

! Six percent or more of labor force unemployed; figures in parentheses are latest available unemployment rates.

* Would be eligible for assistance under Douglas bill as of January 1959. Major area.

Source: Bureau of Employment Security.

TABLE IV.-Number of mills and employees involved in textile mill liquidations, by industry branch, 1946–581

[blocks in formation]

1 Includes only cotton-rayon, woolen and worsted, and dyeing and finishing plants.
Excludes small New York City area dyers.
Excludes narrow fabric mills.

TABLE V.-Maximum basic weekly unemployment insurance benefit amounts and average weekly benefit amounts

[blocks in formation]

Source: Bureau of Employment Security, U.S. Department of Labor.

[blocks in formation]

TABLE VI.-Exhaustion of regular State unemployment insurance benefits, Jan. 1 to Sept. 1, 1958

[blocks in formation]

Source: Bureau of Employment Security, U.S. Department of Labor.

TABLE VII.—Duration of unemployment benefits under regular State laws

[blocks in formation]

Source: Bureau of Employment Security, U.S. Department of Labor.

[ocr errors]

1 21. 1

23.8

26. 0

19.7

20. 4

15.5

127.3

125.8

[ocr errors]

26.0

21.3

30

30.0

121.3

1 19.2

18

13.3

26

25.2

[blocks in formation]

TABLE VIII.-Ratios of reserves to annual taxable wages, Rhode Island,
Pennsylvania, and the average for all States, 1958-59

[blocks in formation]

Source: Bureau of Employment Security, U.S. Department of Labor.

The CHAIRMAN. Do I understand you to say that Mr. Cook also wanted to make a statement?

Mr. STETIN. Yes, Mr. Cook is here and he has a statement to make at this time.

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Cook, before you begin, I notice your statement is some 20 pages. We have allotted Mr. Pollock 20 minutes and we have already consumed 30 minutes. How much time will it take you? Mr. Cook. I will try to do it in 5 minutes.

The CHAIRMAN. Your entire statement will be included in the record.

Mr. Cook. The statement speaks for itself and it is, as a matter of fact, a statement of a concrete example of the type of case which is stressed in the statement of Mr. Pollock.

The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Cook, identify yourself first for the record. Mr. Cook. Wesley W. Cook, residence at 58F Crescent Road, Greenbelt, Md., with offices in Washington at 1025 Vermont Avenue NW. The CHAIRMAN. You are recognized, sir.

Mr. Cook. The Roanoke plant was a substantial plant at the time that it shut down on October 19, 1958. The plant employed approximately 2,300 people. We made a survey at the end of that month and the first half of November. We sent out an extensive questionnaire to which we had nearly 1,400 replies. The exact figures are in the statement. We submitted to the Senate subcommittee which was studying the problems of the domestic textile industry a full statement of the results of that survey, and if I may, sir, I would like to submit a copy so that you can compare it with this resurvey and the present status.

The CHAIRMAN. Without objection that will be included in the record.

(Mr. Cook's prepared statement follows:)

TESTIMONY OF WESLEY W. COOK, VICE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF SYNTHETIC DIVISION, TEXTILE WORKERS' UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO

Mr. Chairman, my name is Wesley W. Cook. I reside at 58F Crescent Road, Greenbelt, Md. My office is at 1025 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. I am a vice president of the Textile Workers' Union of America, AFL-CIO, and director of the union's synthetic division and of its upper south division.

« PreviousContinue »