Bruce E. Deal, Integrated Circuits R & D Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Palo Alto, CA 94304 Robert D. Dobrott, Materials Characterization Laboratory Texas Instruments Incorporated, Dallas, TX 75222 Cameca Instruments, Incorporated, Elmsford, NY 10523 THE EFFECT OF SPECIMEN COOLING ON THE MIGRATION OF SODIUM IN THIN FILM SiO2 Bradway F. Phillips, Naval Weapons Support Center, Crane, IN 47522 Alfred E. Austin, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, OH 43201 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ELECTRON AND PHOTON BEAMS TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS APPLICATIONS OF SCANNING AUGER SPECTROSCOPY (SAM) TO THE SILICON INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (SIC) TECHNOLOGY . 105 Joseph M. Morabito, Bell Laboratories, Allentown, PA 18103 USE OF AUGER ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY TO DETERMINE THE STRUCTURE OF SILICON OXIDE 119 Jan S. Johannessen and William E. Spicer Stanford Electronics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 AN AUGER ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY STUDY OF SILICON SPECTRA FROM SILICON MONOXIDE, 125 Yale E. Strausser, Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA 94305 SURFACE COMPOSITIONAL CHANGES WITH ELECTRON BOMBARDMENT OBSERVED BY AES 139 Simon Thomas, Semiconductor Analytical Laboratory Motorola Semiconductor Products Division, Phoenix, AZ 85008 COMBINED SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY - AUGER SPECTROSCOPY FOR MICRO-SPOT SURFACE 143 A. Christou, W. Weisenberger and H. M. Day Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375 APPLICATIONS OF X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY (ESCA) TO MIS DEVICES SILICON DEVICE APPLICATIONS USING A COMBINED ESCA/AES ANALYSIS SYSTEM Physical Electronics Industries, Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN 55343 183 189 10598 05452 PHOTOEMISSION AND PHOTOVOLTAIC IMAGING OF SEMICONDUCTOR SURFACES IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 ELECTRON BEAM INDUCED IMAGING OF SILICON SURFACES William R. Bottoms, Department of Electrical Engineering 197 211 Certain commercial materials and equipment are identified in these proceedings in order to adequately specify the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Bureau of Standards, nor does it imply that the material or equipment identified is necessarily the best available for the purpose. WELCOMING REMARKS Judson C. French, Chief Electronic Technology Division National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C. 20234 Good morning. It is my pleasure this morning to welcome you on behalf of the National Bureau of Standards and our cosponsor, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, to the Workshop on Surface Analysis for Silicon Devices. This Workshop is the fourth in a series dedicated to the furtherance of the measurement technology needed by the semiconductor device industry in its attempt to provide to its customers products that are based on the most advanced technology yet have high reliability and the affordable costs which result from high yields. These products are essential components in modern electronics, and they consequently play a vital role in the social and economic welfare of our Nation and in its defense. They are, therefore, a matter of considerable interest both to the Department of Commerce and to the Department of Defense, the parent organizations of the sponsors of these Workshops. To those of you who are not in the semiconductor business, and in this Workshop in particular there are many such people, it may come as a surprise that there is any need for NBS and ARPA to carry on work in a field which is so technologically sophisticated and so innovative. The reason is that the sophistication and innovative abilities of the semiconductor industry have led to the development of new processes and new devices much faster than the measurement techniques for their control and characterization have been developed. In the fifteen years that our NBS staff has worked with the semiconductor industry and its customers we have seen increasing need for improvements in practical methods of measurement for analysis, control, and specifications in this field. And we have learned that the Bureau can be especially helpful in this field because of its neutrality in evaluating measurement methods and associated technology, and because its charter encourages it to work in the area of generic measurement for industry-wide use and market-place application. This is an area where individual companies understand ably find less incentive for extensive research than in areas leading to new and proprietary processes and designs. As a result, the NBS Semiconductor Technology Program has been established, having as its goal the development and standardization of improved methods of measurement for use in specifying materials and devices and in control of device fabrication processes: methods that have been well documented and tested for technical adequacy, are of demonstrated precision of an industrially acceptable level, and are acceptable to both users and suppliers. When such methods are used by the electronics industry, they are expected to provide a more consistent set of measured results and interpretations and, hence, lead to improved quality control and yield in the manufacturer's plant, and to improved reliability and economy in the customer's applications. In recent years, ARPA has joined with us as a major sponsor of the program in order to provide a new approach to the solution of DoD problems in component reliability and availability, system costs, and system maintainability. Our program now encompasses work on selected measurements ranging from those needed to characterize process materials; through those for photolithography, process control using test structures, bonding and die attachment, and hermeticity; on to thermal and electrical properties of finished devices. Modern devices are dependent for their operation on the properties of extremely thin layers of silicon and oxides, and their interfaces. Performance demands, including those of reliability and radiation hardness, call for knowledge and manufacturing control of the chemical and physical makeup of these structures that pose requirements for sensitivity and spatial resolution far exceeding those provided by traditional analytical methods. Thus, an exciting new area of interest in our Program is the subject of this Workshop: the determination of the present qualitative |