...enforcement officer. (4) On-base animal bite cases. (5) Personal injury from asbestos or radon. (6) Claims based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...care, in the execution of a statute or regulation. (7) Claims based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary...

...enforcement officer. (4) On-base animal bite cases. (5) Personal injury from asbestos or radon. (6) Claims based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...care, in the execution of a statute or regulation. (7) Claims based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary...

...enforcement officer. (4) On-base animal bite cases. (5) Personal injury from asbestos or radon. (6) Claims based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...government, exercising due care, in the execution ol a statute or regulation. (7) Claims based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise...

...payable if it — (a) Is based upon an act or omission of military personnel or a civilian employee, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not the statute or regulation is valid; (b) Is based on the exercise or performance of, or the failure...

...rejected. The provisions of 28 USC § 2680 (a), excluding liability in instances where the claim is based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...care, in the execution of a statute or regulation is not applicable to the factual circumstances herein. Smith v US (1957, DC Va), 155 F Supp 605. [See...

...the 62 Conversely, the Tort Claims Act (28 USC 2680 (a) ) exempts from the coverage of that statute a claim "based upon an act or omission of an employee...exercising due care, in the execution of a, statute or reglation, whether or not such statute or regulation be valid * * *." 778 courts have a ready answer...

...exercise or performance, or the failure to exercise or perform, a discretionary function or duty;" or (2) "an act or omission of an employee of the government, exercising due care, in the executive of a statute or regulation". The second is the negative one that the claims asserted are...

...the discretion involved be abused, and claims based upon the act or omission of a Government employee exercising due care in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not valid. This is a highly important exception, intended to preclude any possibility that the bill might...

...discretion Involved be abused, and1 claims based upon the act or omission of a Government employee exercising due care In the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not valid. This is a highly Important exception, Intended to preclude any possibility that the bill might...

...claim which — (a) Is based upon an act or omission of military personnel or a civilian employee, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not the statute or regulation is valid, or in the exercise or performance of, or the failure to exercise...