Indian Tribal Conflict Resolution and Tort Claims and Risk Management Act of 1998: Hearing Before the Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session, on S. 2097 ... July 15, 1998, Washington DC.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1999 - 348 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 40
Page 8
Consistent with the 14 United States Constitution , treaties , and principles of trib15 al and State sovereignty , and consistent with Supreme 16 Court decisions regarding the collection and payment of 17 certain retail taxes of a State ...
Consistent with the 14 United States Constitution , treaties , and principles of trib15 al and State sovereignty , and consistent with Supreme 16 Court decisions regarding the collection and payment of 17 certain retail taxes of a State ...
Page 16
... 18 owed by an Indian tribe to a State or political subdivision 19 thereof and shall include or admit of counterclaims , 20 setoffs , or related claims submitted or filed by the tribe 21 in question regarding the original claim .
... 18 owed by an Indian tribe to a State or political subdivision 19 thereof and shall include or admit of counterclaims , 20 setoffs , or related claims submitted or filed by the tribe 21 in question regarding the original claim .
Page 33
It seems to me that there's some need for negotiated settlements that arise from the State of law itself regarding transactions taking place on tribal lands that involve non - Indians . As I understand the saw , the courts really apply ...
It seems to me that there's some need for negotiated settlements that arise from the State of law itself regarding transactions taking place on tribal lands that involve non - Indians . As I understand the saw , the courts really apply ...
Page 34
those claims that the parties agreed to put in mediation would be those claims that would be considered by the panel , and in my written testimony I've pointed out some suggestions regarding section 102 ( e ) ( 2 ) and section 103 ( c ) ...
those claims that the parties agreed to put in mediation would be those claims that would be considered by the panel , and in my written testimony I've pointed out some suggestions regarding section 102 ( e ) ( 2 ) and section 103 ( c ) ...
Page 35
For at least three reasons , NACS and SIGMA cannot support S. 2097 , at least with respect to the resolution of disputes regarding claims for the collection and remittance of State - imposed excise and sales taxes .
For at least three reasons , NACS and SIGMA cannot support S. 2097 , at least with respect to the resolution of disputes regarding claims for the collection and remittance of State - imposed excise and sales taxes .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addition agreement Amendments appears apply appropriate assist authority believe bill brokers carrying Center for Health Chairman collection Committee compact concern Congress consider contract contractors cost court covered create damages decision defense Department described determine develop dispute resolution duplicative employees employment enforcement established example existing experience extent fact Federal agency Federal government filed FTCA coverage Health Policy Research Indian tribes individual injury insurance companies insurance coverage Interior involved issues jurisdiction legislation limited malpractice matter mediation negotiations Office operation Panel participate parties premiums private insurance private liability insurance problems procedures programs protection purchase questions regarding regulations representatives request reservation resolve responsibility result scope Secretary self-determination Senator sovereign immunity specific suit Thank Title Tort Claims tribal governments tribal organizations tribes and tribal understanding United Washington