Indian Tribal Conflict Resolution and Tort Claims and Risk Management Act of 1998: Hearing Before the Committee on Indian Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Second Session, on S. 2097 ... July 15, 1998, Washington DC.U.S. Government Printing Office, 1999 - 348 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 28
Page 62
Given the number of existing , voluntary tribal - state agreements in this area , and given the ability of state legislatures to enact state tax laws that can virtually ensure the collection of this type of tax , the Department believes ...
Given the number of existing , voluntary tribal - state agreements in this area , and given the ability of state legislatures to enact state tax laws that can virtually ensure the collection of this type of tax , the Department believes ...
Page 71
System Design Analysis of existing mechanisms and design of appropriate methods and strategies for implementing ADR . Education , Training , Mentoring Programs for educating the general user of ADR Services , training in mediation ...
System Design Analysis of existing mechanisms and design of appropriate methods and strategies for implementing ADR . Education , Training , Mentoring Programs for educating the general user of ADR Services , training in mediation ...
Page 82
However , the words " not subject to a negotiated settlement " could also be interpreted to mean all issues existing between the parties , even those they did not even attempt to resolve through mediation .
However , the words " not subject to a negotiated settlement " could also be interpreted to mean all issues existing between the parties , even those they did not even attempt to resolve through mediation .
Page 85
The establishment of this panel through Section 103 of S. 2097 implies that the existing avenues of dispute resolution open to tribes and states are inadequate or in some way flawed . NACS and SIGMA find this implication erroneous .
The establishment of this panel through Section 103 of S. 2097 implies that the existing avenues of dispute resolution open to tribes and states are inadequate or in some way flawed . NACS and SIGMA find this implication erroneous .
Page 88
In addition , Senator Gorton's bill does not disturb any existing state law or state / tribal compacts or agreements that exempts a tribe from collecting and remitting state excise , sales , or transaction taxes .
In addition , Senator Gorton's bill does not disturb any existing state law or state / tribal compacts or agreements that exempts a tribe from collecting and remitting state excise , sales , or transaction taxes .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action activities addition agreement Amendments appears apply appropriate assist authority believe bill brokers carrying Center for Health Chairman collection Committee compact concern Congress consider contract contractors cost court covered create damages decision defense Department described determine develop dispute resolution duplicative employees employment enforcement established example existing experience extent fact Federal agency Federal government filed FTCA coverage Health Policy Research Indian tribes individual injury insurance companies insurance coverage Interior involved issues jurisdiction legislation limited malpractice matter mediation negotiations Office operation Panel participate parties premiums private insurance private liability insurance problems procedures programs protection purchase questions regarding regulations representatives request reservation resolve responsibility result scope Secretary self-determination Senator sovereign immunity specific suit Thank Title Tort Claims tribal governments tribal organizations tribes and tribal understanding United Washington