Congress. MODIFICATIONS IN THE PROPOSED ARRANGEMENTS HEARINGS BEFORE THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON ATOMIC ENERGY CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES NINETY-FOURTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS WHICH RELATE TO MODI- PROJECT APRIL 14 AND 29, 1976 Printed for the use of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy 72-818 O U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1976 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office XF25 As 1976c. JOINT COMMITTEE ON ATOMIC ENERGY JOHN O. PASTORE, Rhode Island, Chairman SENATE HENRY M. JACKSON, Washington HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JOHN YOUNG, Texas TENO RONCALIO, Wyoming MIKE MCCORMACK, Washington JOHN B. ANDERSON, Illinois GEORGE F. MURPHY, Jr., Executive Director ALBION W. KNIGHT, Jr., Professional Staff Member MICHAEL R. KEPPEL, GAO Consultant (II) Dembling, Paul G., General Counsel, accompanied by Richard Kelley, Associate Director; Ralph Carlone, Assistant Director, Resources and Economic Development Division; and Richard Conway, attorney, Seamans, Dr. Robert C., Jr., Administrator, accompanied by Dr. G. W. Cunningham, Deputy Director for Technology, Division of Reactor Development and Demonstration; M. C. Greer, Controller: and Lloyd W. Sides, Assistant General Counsel, Energy Research and Development Behnke, Wallace B., executive vice president, Commonwealth Edison Co., and Chairman of the Board of the Project Management Corp--- Pastore, Hon. John O., chairman, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy: Opening remarks at open meeting of Thursday, April 29, 1976---- Letter dated May 27, 1969: R. E. Hollingsworth, General Manager, Atomic Energy Commission, to Chairman Chet Holifield, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy relative to initial plans toward LMFBR demonstration plant cooperative arrangement_-- Statutory criteria for fourth round arrangements under the Commission's power reactor demonstration program....... GAO Report (B-164105): Proposed Changes to the AEC's Arrangement for Carrying Out the Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor Demonstration Appendix: Analysis of proposed changes to cooperative arrangement__ Appendix: Responsibility for technical supervision of the nuclear Further comments on proposed arrangement. Appendix: Comments on AEC's response to concerns expressed by Extract from part 4, ERDA authorizing legislation, fiscal year 1976: Enclosure 1. Proposed revised section of authorization bill. Enclosure 3. Amended statutory criteria for fourth round arrange- Enclosure 4. Revised program justification data arrangements No. Appendix A: CRBR cost estimate___ Paragraph (h) of No. 77-106 as subsequently revised and forwarded |