New Frontiers in Science and Technology StudiesPolity Press, 2007 M10 1 - 240 pages Steve Fuller has a reputation for setting the terms of debate within science and technology studies. In his latest book, New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies he charts the debates likely to be of relevance in the coming years.
These questions are explored by examining an array of historical, philosophical and contemporary sources. Attention is paid, for example, to the Bruno Latour's The Politics of Nature as a model for science policy, as well as the global controversy surrounding Bjorn Lomborg's The Sceptical Environmentalist, which led to the dismantling and re-establishment of the Danish national research ethics board. New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies will appeal strongly to scholars and advanced undergraduate and graduate students in courses concerned with the social dimensions of science and technology, and anyone who cares about the future of science. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 13
Page 64
... responsibilities , whereas the constructivists embrace science's social responsibilities , as per the " artificialist " perspective discussed in section 1.2 above . I shall explain and defend this point more fully in section 3. But ...
... responsibilities , whereas the constructivists embrace science's social responsibilities , as per the " artificialist " perspective discussed in section 1.2 above . I shall explain and defend this point more fully in section 3. But ...
Page 76
... responsibility by campaigning against nuclear weapons , once they started to proliferate . Those who saw this activ- ity as part of their responsibility as scientists would be classed as con- structivists . In contrast , realists tend ...
... responsibility by campaigning against nuclear weapons , once they started to proliferate . Those who saw this activ- ity as part of their responsibility as scientists would be classed as con- structivists . In contrast , realists tend ...
Page 77
... responsibility for the good consequences of their research but refusing responsibility for the bad ones . From that stand- point , constructivists can at least claim the virtue of symmetry , a will- ingness to take responsibility for ...
... responsibility for the good consequences of their research but refusing responsibility for the bad ones . From that stand- point , constructivists can at least claim the virtue of symmetry , a will- ingness to take responsibility for ...
Contents
List of Tables and Boxes | 1 |
Sciences Need for Unity | 53 |
Contrasting Visions | 85 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
20th century academic autonomy Bateson believe biology Bruno Latour called Cold War common conception constitution constructivist context contrast criticism culture Da Vinci Code demarcation problem disciplines distinction disunificationists E. O. Wilson economic emergence empirical Enlightenment environment epistemic epistemic justice fraud Friedrich Hayek Fuller Galileo Galison genetic global history of science human idea ideological individuals inquiry instantiationist intellectual interests Karl Popper knowledge claims Kuhn Kuhn's language Latour least logical positivism logical positivists Lomborg matter metaphysical modern Mooney normative open society organisms original paradigm peer review perhaps philosophers philosophy of science physical Popper positivism postmodern potential practice principle radical realist reality realized reductionism regime republican research ethics rhetoric science policy science's Scientific Revolution scientists secular sense simply social engineering social epistemology social science sociology specific standpoint strategy theory tion today's turn ultimate unification unified unity of science whereas whereby