New Frontiers in Science and Technology StudiesPolity Press, 2007 M10 1 - 240 pages Steve Fuller has a reputation for setting the terms of debate within science and technology studies. In his latest book, New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies he charts the debates likely to be of relevance in the coming years.
These questions are explored by examining an array of historical, philosophical and contemporary sources. Attention is paid, for example, to the Bruno Latour's The Politics of Nature as a model for science policy, as well as the global controversy surrounding Bjorn Lomborg's The Sceptical Environmentalist, which led to the dismantling and re-establishment of the Danish national research ethics board. New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies will appeal strongly to scholars and advanced undergraduate and graduate students in courses concerned with the social dimensions of science and technology, and anyone who cares about the future of science. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 19
Page 114
... benefit ( say , as a failure to develop one's potential ) . While this last point may seem obvious , Popper nevertheless ... benefits and harms is always asymmetrical and , if left unattended , will probably track already existing class ...
... benefit ( say , as a failure to develop one's potential ) . While this last point may seem obvious , Popper nevertheless ... benefits and harms is always asymmetrical and , if left unattended , will probably track already existing class ...
Page 117
... benefits from the misfortunes of others , often simply by virtue of having arrived on the scene after the afflicted parties . On a more strictly sociological plane , we can grade types of insti- tutions by how they foster the risk ...
... benefits from the misfortunes of others , often simply by virtue of having arrived on the scene after the afflicted parties . On a more strictly sociological plane , we can grade types of insti- tutions by how they foster the risk ...
Page 134
... benefit from one funding stream , while only pseudoscientists and their political mouth- pieces would benefit from another . Then those falling into the latter category are formally identified and , where possible , the patronage trail ...
... benefit from one funding stream , while only pseudoscientists and their political mouth- pieces would benefit from another . Then those falling into the latter category are formally identified and , where possible , the patronage trail ...
Contents
List of Tables and Boxes | 1 |
Sciences Need for Unity | 53 |
Contrasting Visions | 85 |
Copyright | |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
20th century academic autonomy Bateson believe biology Bruno Latour called Cold War common conception constitution constructivist context contrast criticism culture Da Vinci Code demarcation problem disciplines distinction disunificationists E. O. Wilson economic emergence empirical Enlightenment environment epistemic epistemic justice fraud Friedrich Hayek Fuller Galileo Galison genetic global history of science human idea ideological individuals inquiry instantiationist intellectual interests Karl Popper knowledge claims Kuhn Kuhn's language Latour least logical positivism logical positivists Lomborg matter metaphysical modern Mooney normative open society organisms original paradigm peer review perhaps philosophers philosophy of science physical Popper positivism postmodern potential practice principle radical realist reality realized reductionism regime republican research ethics rhetoric science policy science's Scientific Revolution scientists secular sense simply social engineering social epistemology social science sociology specific standpoint strategy theory tion today's turn ultimate unification unified unity of science whereas whereby