...which the search [or seizure] entails." Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 US 523, 534, 536-537 (1967). And in justifying the particular intrusion the police...specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.18 The scheme of the Fourth...

...the search [or seizure] entails." Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 US 523, 534-535, 536-537 (1967). And in justifying the particular intrusion the police...specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.18 The scheme of the Fourth...

...which the search [or seizure] entails." Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 US 523, 534, 536-537 (1967). And in justifying the particular intrusion the police...to point to specific and articulable facts which, 1088 taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.18...

...which the search [or seizure] entails." Comoro v. Municipal Court, 387 US 523, 534, 536-537 (1967). And in justifying the particular intrusion the police...to point to specific and articulable facts which. 1088 taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.18...

...Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio. There the Supreme Court wrote that in justifying a street search a police officer "must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, when taken together with rational inferences from these facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion." In...

...intelligence information on an individual may be disseminated to a second agency only if that agency is able to point to "specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, warrant the conclusion that the individual has committed or is...

...reliability of information already in its possession or for investigative purposes if the agency is able to point to specific and articulable facts which taken together with rational inferences from these facts warrant the conclusion that the individual has committed or is...

...the leading case in the area of defining the power to investigate. In Terry, the Court stated that "in justifying the particular intrusion the police...specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts reasonably warrant that intrusion." In Terry the police were only...

...the leading case in the area of defining the power to investigate. In Terry, the Court stated that "in justifying the particular intrusion the police...specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts reasonably warrant that intrusion." In Terry the police were only...

...necessary in order to preserve the integrity of particular valuable property threatened by the impoundment: "[I]n justifying the particular intrusion the police...able to point to specific and articulable facts which . . . reasonably warrant that intrusion." Terry v. Ohio, 392 US, at 21. Such a requirement of "specificity...