Standards for the Administration of Juvenile Justice: Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionU.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 1980 - 522 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page ii
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Social Work KF 9779 .A38 1980 1 2.30-81 LETTER OF ...
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Social Work KF 9779 .A38 1980 1 2.30-81 LETTER OF ...
Page iii
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 2.30-81 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To the President and ...
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 2.30-81 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To the President and ...
Page v
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and ...
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and ...
Page ix
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National ... report is submitted pursuant to the National Advisory Committee's standards - setting responsibility . It contains the ...
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National ... report is submitted pursuant to the National Advisory Committee's standards - setting responsibility . It contains the ...
Page xv
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. assistance required to carry on this effort ; and ...
Report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention United States. National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. assistance required to carry on this effort ; and ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adjudication Administration/American Bar Association alleged Association Joint Commission Bar Association Joint child Child Abuse cited as IJA/ABA cited as Report Commentary to Standard Commission on Juvenile Committee on Criminal complaint coordination Corrections Administration counsel Criminal Justice Standards decisions Delinquency Prevention Development educational emergency custody evaluation federal Focal Point Social Force on Juvenile group home hereinafter cited his/her Institute of Judicial intake unit intervention Judicial Administration/American Bar jurisdiction Justice and Delinquency juvenile delinquency Juvenile Justice Standards juvenile justice system Juvenile Law Juvenile Service System Law Enforcement Agencies local planning authority Medical Restraints National Advisory Committee neglect and abuse neglect or abuse noncriminal misbehavior Nonlaw Enforcement Agencies ombudsman Personnel police primary caretaker problems proceedings programs Records Related Standards staff standard recommends Standards and Goals Standards Relating Strategy Supp supra at Commentary supra at Standard Task Force tentative draft training school treatment youth
Popular passages
Page 504 - Shelton v. Tucker. 364 US 479. 488 (1960): "In a series of decisions this Court has held that, even though the governmental purpose be legitimate and substantial, that purpose cannot be pursued by means that broadly stifle fundamental personal liberties when the end can be more narrowly achieved.
Page 501 - First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.
Page 191 - The point of the Fourth Amendment, which often is not grasped by zealous officers, is not that it denies law enforcement the support of the usual inferences which reasonable men draw from evidence. Its protection consists in requiring that those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime.
Page 504 - The final principle inherent in the Clause is that a severe punishment must not be excessive. A punishment is excessive under this principle if it is unnecessary: The infliction of a severe punishment by the State cannot comport with human dignity when it is nothing more than the pointless infliction of suffering.
Page 181 - And in justifying the particular intrusion the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.
Page 477 - On the one hand, it forestalls compulsion by law of the acceptance of any creed or the practice of any form of worship. Freedom of conscience and freedom to adhere to such religious organization or form of worship as the individual may choose cannot be restricted by law. On the other hand, it safeguards the free exercise of the chosen form of religion.
Page 475 - Tex 1974), revd on other grounds, 535 F2d 864 (5th Cir 1976), revd and remanded, 430 US 322, remanded on rehg, 562 F2d 993 (5th Cir 1977) (comprehensive guidelines for academic programming); Martarella v Kelley, 359 F Supp 478 (SDNY 1973); Inmates of Boys' Training School v Affleck, 346 F Supp 1354 (DRI 1972), CA No 4529 (DRI Jan 25, 1979) (final order).
Page 181 - And in determining whether the officer acted reasonably in such circumstances, due weight must be given, not to his inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or "hunch...
Page 194 - The standard for arrest is probable cause, defined in terms of facts and circumstances "sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the [suspect] had committed or was committing an offense.
Page 332 - Alschuler, The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining, 36 U. Chi. L. Rev. 50 (1968); Frank H.