Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 8U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES SEP 2 3 2002 DEPOSITED BY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS ...
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES SEP 2 3 2002 DEPOSITED BY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS ...
Page i
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY SEPTEMBER 1998 TO ...
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY SEPTEMBER 1998 TO ...
Page 1
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. IN RE MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY PSD Appeal No. 98–2 ORDER DENYING REVIEW Decided September 10 , 1998 Syllabus Before the Board is ...
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. IN RE MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY PSD Appeal No. 98–2 ORDER DENYING REVIEW Decided September 10 , 1998 Syllabus Before the Board is ...
Page 23
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. IN RE ENVIRONMENTAL DISPOSAL SYSTEMS , INC . UIC Appeal Nos . 98-1 & 98-2 ORDER DENYING REVIEW Decided October 15 , 1998 ...
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. IN RE ENVIRONMENTAL DISPOSAL SYSTEMS , INC . UIC Appeal Nos . 98-1 & 98-2 ORDER DENYING REVIEW Decided October 15 , 1998 ...
Page 24
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. ( 3 ) The fact that the permits were not signed by the Director of the Region V Water Division does not serve as a basis for ...
Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency United States. Environmental Protection Agency. ( 3 ) The fact that the permits were not signed by the Director of the Region V Water Division does not serve as a basis for ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adequately wet Agency air quality alleged ambient air amended Appeal Brief AQMD ARCO ARCO's argues argument asbestos BACT Board CERCLA change-in-service chemical civil penalty Clarksburg Clean Air Act cleanup clear error Cogeneration complaint compliance contamination Corp determination draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence facility federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf liability major stationary source mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell operation penalty appeals penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit appeals permit conditions permit decision pesticide petition for review Petitioners pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD permit public comment period raised RCRA reduction Region's Response regulations regulatory remand remedial reporting requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft sludge soil Steeltech SWMUS tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana waste WDNR wetland
Popular passages
Page 640 - Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish, or (2) accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to either validity or amount, is not admissible to prove liability for or in validity of the claim or its amount.
Page 723 - First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.
Page 450 - If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the admission of such evidence would prejudice him in maintaining his action or defense upon the merits. The court may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet such evidence.
Page 232 - ... a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled.
Page 363 - An aquifer or a portion thereof which meets the criteria for an "underground source of drinking water" in § 146.3 may be determined under 40 CFR 144.8 to be an "exempted aquifer" if it meets the following criteria: (a) It does not currently serve as a source of drinking water; and (b) It cannot now and will not in the future serve as a source of drinking water...
Page 75 - stationary source" means any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any air pollutant. (4) The term "modification" means any physical change in, or change in the method of operation of, a stationary source which increases the amount of any air pollutant emitted by such source or which results in the emission of any air pollutant not previously emitted. (5) The term "owner or operator" means any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises a stationary...
Page 128 - best available control technology" means an emission limitation based on the maximum degree of reduction of each pollutant subject to regulation under this Act emitted from or which results from any major emitting facility, which the permitting authority, on a case-by-case basis, taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts and other costs, determines is achievable for such...
Page 279 - Administrator shall take into account the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations and, with respect to the violator, ability to pay, effect on ability to continue to do business, any history of prior such violations, the degree of culpability, and such other matters as justice may require.
Page 274 - Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, an action, suit or proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, shall not be entertained unless commenced within five years from the date when the claim first accrued if, within the same period, the offender or the property is found within the United States in order that proper service may be made thereon.
Page 242 - (C) it will perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; and "(D) when used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice it will not generally cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment.