Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 8U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... Board by Judge Stein : Before the Board is a petition seeking review of certain conditions of a prevention of significant deterioration ( “ PSD " ) permit , Permit No. 0067-01 - C ( the " Permit ” ) , issued by the State of Hawaii's ...
... Board by Judge Stein : Before the Board is a petition seeking review of certain conditions of a prevention of significant deterioration ( “ PSD " ) permit , Permit No. 0067-01 - C ( the " Permit ” ) , issued by the State of Hawaii's ...
Page 7
... Board's review of PSD permitting decisions is governed by 40 C.F.R. part 124 , which " provides the yardstick against which the Board must measure ” petitions for review of PSD and other permit decisions . Commonwealth Chesapeake , 6 ...
... Board's review of PSD permitting decisions is governed by 40 C.F.R. part 124 , which " provides the yardstick against which the Board must measure ” petitions for review of PSD and other permit decisions . Commonwealth Chesapeake , 6 ...
Page 24
... Board review because the permits were signed by the Director's authorized representative . Basham Petition : ( 1 ) Mr. Basham has failed to convince the Board that the absence of a monitoring schedule for likely waste sources is ...
... Board review because the permits were signed by the Director's authorized representative . Basham Petition : ( 1 ) Mr. Basham has failed to convince the Board that the absence of a monitoring schedule for likely waste sources is ...
Page 26
... Board concludes that petitioners have not met the standards necessary to invoke Board review . Thus , for the reasons stated below , the petitions for review are denied . A. Sandra K. Yerman Petition Issue 1 : Ms. Yerman seeks to have ...
... Board concludes that petitioners have not met the standards necessary to invoke Board review . Thus , for the reasons stated below , the petitions for review are denied . A. Sandra K. Yerman Petition Issue 1 : Ms. Yerman seeks to have ...
Page 28
... Board has previously stated : The Board generally tries to construe petitions filed by persons unrepresented by counsel in a light most favorable to the petitioners . While the Board does not expect or demand that such petitions will ...
... Board has previously stated : The Board generally tries to construe petitions filed by persons unrepresented by counsel in a light most favorable to the petitioners . While the Board does not expect or demand that such petitions will ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adequately wet Agency air quality alleged ambient air amended Appeal Brief AQMD ARCO ARCO's argues argument asbestos BACT Board CERCLA change-in-service chemical civil penalty Clarksburg Clean Air Act cleanup clear error Cogeneration complaint compliance contamination Corp determination draft permit emission limit enforcement Environmental EPA's EPCRA evidence facility federal FIFRA filed Final Permit hazardous impact Initial Decision injection issue Knauf liability major stationary source mineral oil monitoring NAAQS naphtha Newell operation penalty appeals penalty assessment Penalty Policy permit appeals permit conditions permit decision pesticide petition for review Petitioners pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's proposed PSD permit public comment period raised RCRA reduction Region's Response regulations regulatory remand remedial reporting requirements Response to Comments Rio Mameyes SchoolCraft sludge soil Steeltech SWMUS tanks tion U.S. EPA USTS violations Waimana waste WDNR wetland
Popular passages
Page 640 - Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish, or (2) accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to either validity or amount, is not admissible to prove liability for or in validity of the claim or its amount.
Page 723 - First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.
Page 450 - If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the admission of such evidence would prejudice him in maintaining his action or defense upon the merits. The court may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet such evidence.
Page 232 - ... a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled.
Page 363 - An aquifer or a portion thereof which meets the criteria for an "underground source of drinking water" in § 146.3 may be determined under 40 CFR 144.8 to be an "exempted aquifer" if it meets the following criteria: (a) It does not currently serve as a source of drinking water; and (b) It cannot now and will not in the future serve as a source of drinking water...
Page 75 - stationary source" means any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any air pollutant. (4) The term "modification" means any physical change in, or change in the method of operation of, a stationary source which increases the amount of any air pollutant emitted by such source or which results in the emission of any air pollutant not previously emitted. (5) The term "owner or operator" means any person who owns, leases, operates, controls, or supervises a stationary...
Page 128 - best available control technology" means an emission limitation based on the maximum degree of reduction of each pollutant subject to regulation under this Act emitted from or which results from any major emitting facility, which the permitting authority, on a case-by-case basis, taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts and other costs, determines is achievable for such...
Page 279 - Administrator shall take into account the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation or violations and, with respect to the violator, ability to pay, effect on ability to continue to do business, any history of prior such violations, the degree of culpability, and such other matters as justice may require.
Page 274 - Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, an action, suit or proceeding for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, shall not be entertained unless commenced within five years from the date when the claim first accrued if, within the same period, the offender or the property is found within the United States in order that proper service may be made thereon.
Page 242 - (C) it will perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; and "(D) when used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice it will not generally cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment.