Page images
PDF
EPUB
[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]
[graphic]

Emergency Bupport Team, which has assets, and the rest. They get out to t critical time is the first couple of hour nize that. But those first few hours d make sure those assets can get out ther

It's also his job to work very closely who is the on-scene commander for cons And we look to him. That FBI SAC lo Bay, what do we do in terms of conse One of the prior panelists very accuratel it's everything happens at once; it's er medical

hope at the end of the day, after thi cause it's not mature right now, that we atic approach to whether it's a big bomb, have the kind of systematic approach and out there. It's not there. We want to get it ing to get it there, but it's not there.

Mr. SOUDER. Mr. Rnouss, I wonder, could from FEMA's perspective? We had a ques aure Mr. Blitzer will hope to get the best for cooperation possible from the FBI. Cou bit from PEMA's perspective how in real life you come in, who you check with, For exam City bombing, what if there had been a tim was going to come after the first hit, and th ke was conventional bomb and moved to dogs FEMA come in and who does that kind o

ME KNOUSS, Well, Mr. Chairman, let me baven't left the wrong impression. I work for Public Health Service, What I'm responsible fo medical portion of FEMA'S response plan. So fr our responsibilities purely relate to how can whether we're supporting FEMA or whether w FBI from a technical assistance point of view, d health consequences of one of these incidents. W that, whether we're dealing with a big bomb ng with a chemical incident, or a biological in SOUDER. In your chain, do you work throug or some other agency?

KNOUSS, We really have uniquely here two is to support PEMA on the health and medica onse to an event if it actually occurs; we also ity to the FBI in the law enforcement perspect nical assistance on what the nature of the thr might go about a threat reduction. So we're es of the aisle, as it were

alth perene

[graphic]
[ocr errors]

and the rest. They get out to the scene within 4 hour Theaters, and the trainers after how suggest mes the first couple of hours though, and we all use, but there is no process for them to But those first few hours do extend, and it's hisements. I like you to respond to both a 2% ale his to work very closely with the person from Mr. ROBERTS. As we complete the training the assets can get out there as quickly as possi these commander for consequence management fire's a detailed critique sheet that is provide would please to him That FBI SAC looks to that PEMA to sit in the classroom. Those critique sheets wwed in terms of consequence management heners and put together, and discussed it o De panelists very accurately described what appeals and others. So. 1 am, & lit supe thing happens at once; it's crisis, it's consequence

he day, after this program is mature

spot there

[ocr errors]

the FBI. Could you describe www.dow in real life this works, aut wer

apparently particinated in the process d adequate feedback 1002

now, that we have the kane along, and it might be possible that in de We have been continua. modifying the o s a big bomb, or a chem or and iterations, the critique sheet and feedback approach and assets that are here. But to my knowledge, today and s... We want to get it there. We've beer w ward, there is an insistence on the part of the im I wonder, could you explain and we roll those grades up into booklets, and 1 ask the students to fill out written sheets that We had a question raise w to get the best grade on do, based on classroom critique comments review the booklet from each city to see how we I must say, frequently firefighters and police th For example, in the One They don't pull a punch. So, I believe there is an e had been a time delay chemica loop. It is through the process of a critique ahee blunt, if you're wasting their time, on some of the the students in the classroom and who work on th I would also take-I'd like to explain that alth classes are not hands-on and are basically award my recollection that two of the six clasa we p hands-on training and have the firefighters, police ers in suits, attempting to move their way th I'm a little bit surprised by the comment and identification process, and the real of it Flex

fst hit, and the population

A and moved toward the W
s that kind of analysis of

Carman, let me make sure I work for the United States responsible for is the heat an Lasse plan. So from our perspective ~ate to how can we function ex MA or whether we're supporting punt of view, of dealing w As incidents. We are respousine with a big bomb, or whether were a biological incident.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

work through FEMA then r

ly here two responsibilitier and medical portions of the Nurs; we also have a respon nforcement perspective of proving e nature of the threat is, and how duction. So we're playing on bott But primarily bringing a unique

[ocr errors]

Mr. BARRETT. Had you heard those complainte
Mr. ROBERTS. I had not heard the f
back loop complaint, before today, no

If I might just quickly try to work through the
because we've been central to that The ****
vides is equipment designed to wil the ti
who we have trained, to in turn from the fir****

cities.

We recognize we call it an exp
nize that if the equipment wer* **** **, but
much in training, it more ww
response. Ba, de un t

[ocr errors]

Stanford Law Library

3 6105 062 623 728

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT

DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman

BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York
J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois
CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland
CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut
CHRISTOPHER COX, California
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida
JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York
STEPHEN HORN, California
JOHN L. MICA, Florida
THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia
DAVID M. MCINTOSH, Indiana
MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana
JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida
JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona
STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio

MARSHALL "MARK" SANFORD, South
Carolina

JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire
PETE SESSIONS, Texas

MICHAEL PAPPAS, New Jersey

VINCE SNOWBARGER, Kansas

BOB BARR, Georgia

DAN MILLER, Florida

RON LEWIS, Kentucky

HENRY A. WAXMAN, California
TOM LANTOS, California

ROBERT E. WISE, JR., West Virginia
MAJOR R. OWENS, New York
EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York

PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania
GARY A. CONDIT, California
CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York
THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin

ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington,

[graphic]

DC

CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania

ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland

DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio

ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois
DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois

JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts
JIM TURNER, Texas

THOMAS H. ALLEN, Maine

HAROLD E. FORD, JR., Tennessee

BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont (Independent)

KEVIN BINGER, Staff Director

DANIEL R. MOLL, Deputy Staff Director

DAVID A. KASS, Deputy Counsel and Parliamentarian
LISA SMITH ARAFUNE, Deputy Chief Clerk
PHIL SCHILIRO, Minority Staff Director

SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, AND CRIMINAL

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »