Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan, Volume 60Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper Phelphs & Stevens, printers, 1888 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 60
Page xxiii
... present and voting in the affirmative ( being a quo- rum ) , agreement valid without proof of notice to absentees , if want of notice does not affirmatively appear - Burden of proof to show non - notice rests on those denying legality ...
... present and voting in the affirmative ( being a quo- rum ) , agreement valid without proof of notice to absentees , if want of notice does not affirmatively appear - Burden of proof to show non - notice rests on those denying legality ...
Page xxxiii
... permanent recognition of his character , which shall bear testimony , not only to the present time , but also to the future , of the esteem and consideration in which he was [ xxxiii ] held by his associates and contemporaries . To this ...
... permanent recognition of his character , which shall bear testimony , not only to the present time , but also to the future , of the esteem and consideration in which he was [ xxxiii ] held by his associates and contemporaries . To this ...
Page xlvi
... present : every one must be judged as things appeared in his own day , and in the light of his surroundings . Col. STUART had and deserved the respect of men of both parties in the Sen- ate , and his reputation is clean and free from ...
... present : every one must be judged as things appeared in his own day , and in the light of his surroundings . Col. STUART had and deserved the respect of men of both parties in the Sen- ate , and his reputation is clean and free from ...
Page 18
... present . The admission of Samuel should not have been used against Richard , nor the statement of Richard against Samuel . The court ought to have carefully instructed the jury upon this point , and explained to them the restriction in ...
... present . The admission of Samuel should not have been used against Richard , nor the statement of Richard against Samuel . The court ought to have carefully instructed the jury upon this point , and explained to them the restriction in ...
Page 19
... present case , when the evidence of respondents ' guilt depends almost entirely upon these declar- ations , we consider the neglect of the court to properly con- fine this testimony within its lawful limit , as an error too grave to be ...
... present case , when the evidence of respondents ' guilt depends almost entirely upon these declar- ations , we consider the neglect of the court to properly con- fine this testimony within its lawful limit , as an error too grave to be ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
38 Mich 46 Mich action affirmed agent alleged Alpena county amount appears Argued February assessment assignment Assumpsit attorney authority Bank bill brings error Buchoz charge circuit court circuit judge claim complainant complainant's contract corporation counsel court of equity creditors Crystal Falls damages decree deed defendant defendant's Detroit dollars duty easement entitled equity estoppel evidence execution facts favor February 17 filed foreclosure fraud garnishee Grand Rapids Greenop held homestead husband interest judgment jurisdiction jury Justices concurred land levy liable lien logs lumber mandamus ment Michigan mortgage objection officer opinion owner paid party payment person plaintiff Port Huron possession premises proceedings proof proper purchase question railroad received record recover refused replevin respondent rule Stat statute statute of frauds subrogated suit supervisor testified testimony thereof timber tion township trespass trial trust valid witness
Popular passages
Page 666 - Each house shall be the judge of the election and qualifications of its own members, and shall determine the rules of its proceedings.
Page 477 - ... and that your orator may have such other and further relief in the premises as the nature and the circumstances of this case may require and as may be agreeable to equity and good conscience.
Page 330 - The doctrine will apply, which is to be found, I believe, In the laws of all civilized nations, that if a man either by words or by conduct, has intimated that he consents to an act which has been done, and that he will offer no opposition to it, although it could not have been lawfully done without his consent, and he thereby induces others to do that from which they otherwise might have abstained, he cannot question the legality of the act he had so sanctioned, to the prejudice of those who have...
Page 471 - Wherever two persons stand in such a relation that, while it continues, confidence is necessarily reposed by one, and the influence which naturally grows out of that confidence is possessed by the other, and this confidence is abused, or the influence is exerted to obtain an advantage at the expense of the confiding party, the party so availing himself of his position will not be permitted to retain the advantage, although the transaction could not have been impeached if no such confidential relation...
Page 367 - Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.
Page 475 - Sixty days after date, we jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of John B.
Page 24 - No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title...
Page 408 - A widow shall be endowed of the third part of all the lands whereof her husband was seized of an estate of inheritance, at any time during the marriage, unless the same shall have been relinquished in legal form.
Page 7 - Every husband, wife, child, parent, guardian, employer or other person, who shall be injured in person or property, or means of support, by any intoxicated person, or in consequence of the intoxication, habitual or otherwise, of any person, shall have a right of action in his or her own name, severally or jointly, against any person or persons who shall, by selling or giving intoxicating liquors, have caused the intoxication, in whole or in part, of such person or persons...
Page 99 - November as above, and the said party of the first part, on receiving such payment at the time and in the manner above mentioned...