Management Planning for Nature Conservation: A Theoretical Basis & Practical Guide
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007 M12 4 - 426 pages
Mike Alexander’s Management Planning for Nature Conservation brings a new dimension to the modern literature on conservation management. Combining key theories with real practice it fills a critical gap which has often hindered in-depth understanding of the planning process. The book provides historical and rational background which helps to explain what makes a really effective management plan, and it presents a detailed practical guide to developing such a plan. It concludes with a series of case studies which clearly illustrate the underlying principles drawn out in the text, while highlighting the different approaches demanded by very different sites.
Drawing on the expertise of leaders in both conservation research and wildlife management, and with a combined experience from around the world, this book is essential reading for professional conservation managers and any student studying management planning for conservation within a range of degree and postgraduate courses. The book will be equally important for those attending professional training programmes and courses for practitioners in the statutory and voluntary environment and wildlife conservation sector.
Mike Alexander has been at the forefront of developing systems and methods in the field of management planning for conservation, with experience ranging from Uganda to Estonia, and from Costa Rica to Wales. He was a member of the team responsible for developing the current management planning guidelines for the international Ramsar (Convention on Wetlands) sites located around the world.
Results 1-5 of 69
I conclude this trilogy of chapters with Chapter 9 where the various approaches to nature conservation management are considered. Chapters 10–16 describe the planning process in considerable detail. The core chapter, Chapter 14 ...
... by upper-level administrators and the possibility of last-minute changes being made by people who were not involved in the planning process and have no understanding of the compromises and tradeoffs that were considered and agreed.
... administrators who were not involved in the planning process or knowledgeable about the compromises and tradeoffs that were considered and agreed upon The preceding concerns or comments fall into two distinct categories.
Also, changes should only be considered when we have better information or when the factors that influence the features change (for example, an alien invasive species may appear on a site).
... upper-level administrators and by the possibility of last-minute changes being made by people who were not involved in the planning process and have no understanding of the compromises and tradeoffs that were considered and agreed.
What people are saying - Write a review