Hearings on National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998--H.R. 1119 and Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Before the Committee on National Security, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First Session: Military Research and Development Subcommittee Hearings on Title II--Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation : Hearings Held February 27, 28, March 6, 13, and May 7, 1997, Volume 2

Front Cover

From inside the book

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 97 - Defense accounts, and programs fully coordinated with the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs, we are emphasizing the development of real-time warning and "all clear...
Page 93 - ... under the Federal Procurement Regulations. This is a important matter that deserves serious thought. The second fundamental concept of Joint Vision 2010 is precision engagement. It is based on a system of systems that enables our forces to locate the objective or target, provide responsive command and control, generate the desired effect, assess our level of success and retain the flexibility to reengage with precision when required.
Page 318 - BMDO began a 15 modernization program to improve the computation suite, including hardware upgrades and developing improved models and simulations to support the program. Our interaction and responsiveness to the needs of the warfighter is a key element in the BMDO mission. The Joint TMD program element funds a critical series of interactions with the warfighting CINCs. Our CINCs TMD Assessment program consists of operational exercises, wargames. and Warfare Analysis Laboratory Exercises (WALEX)....
Page 266 - ... aircraft. China can also deliver these weapons with land-based and emerging sea-based ballistic missile capabilities. We do not see these systems as posing a threat to the United States in the foreseeable future. That is, we do not see an intent that goes with the capability. Even should that situation change, we will continue to field a significant US deterrent force.
Page 69 - I have appreciated this opportunity of appearing before the committee and shall be happy to answer any questions you may have on this bill.
Page 264 - The proliferation of short range ballistic missiles in the world today poses a direct, immediate threat to many of our allies and to some US forces deployed abroad in defense of our national interests. Over time, the proliferation of longer range missiles...
Page 308 - ... do not see a near-term ballistic missile threat to US territory from the socalled rogue nations, but we cannot be complacent about this assessment. The threat of long-range missiles from rogue nations could emerge in the future. The Intelligence Community estimates that this threat would take 15 years to develop, but could be accelerated if those nations acquired this capability from beyond their borders. This...
Page 199 - The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:05 pm, in room 2118, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Curt Weldon (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. CURT WELDON, A REPRESENTATIVE FROM PENNSYLVANIA, CHAIRMAN, MILITARY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE Mr.
Page 120 - ... exercise leadership in a competitive world, it is essential that policies and practices be developed along the following lines: (1) The vigorous cultivation of science not only along the paths of foreseen objectives but also throughout its breadth and depth. In particular, this means thorough attention to the education and training of the scientists and engineers that will be needed. Fortunately, the present trend indicates that this goal is realizable, but only if as a nation we are prepared...
Page 308 - In the case of nuclear strategic weapons, Russia has a significant capability for delivering these weapons with strategic weapon delivery systems land-based and submarine-launched missiles and long range aircraft. China can also deliver these weapons with land-based and emerging sea-based ballistic missile capabilities. We do not see these systems as posing a threat to the United States in the foreseeable future. That is, we do not see an intent that goes with the capability. Even if that situation...

Bibliographic information