Greeks and Barbarians
How did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks.
The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time.
The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history.
Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained.
Results 1-3 of 51
In another sense , however , Goldhill's reading of the play is more conventional . Like many of the play's modern interpreters , he sees it as strikingly sympathetic to the plight of the defeated Persians : for Aeschylus to have ...
One play which seems to fit uneasily into that description of Athenian tragedy — as indeed it fits uneasily into many general arguments about Athenian theatre — is Aeschylus ' Persae . In this brief paper I want to suggest some ways in ...
At three points in the play , there are lengthy lists of Persian names , both of individuals and of races ( see 12-58 , 302–29 , 950–1001 ) ; 27 no individual Greek is named , and only Athens of the Greek cities .
What people are saying - Write a review
General Introduction I
3 the Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden fig 4 the Museum
of Fine Arts Boston fig 5 the Archaeological Institute of
12 other sections not shown