Greeks and BarbariansThomas Harrison Edinburgh University Press, 2002 - 336 pages How did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks. The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time. The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history. Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 16
... Bacchae , maintains , against Dionysus , that ' the Barbarians are much more stupid than the Greeks ' ( 1. 483 ) . But this judgement is immediately challenged by the god ( l . 484 ) , and dis- credited by the entirety of a tragedy ...
... Bacchae did away with the idea of a bound- ary separating Greece and Asia , showing the gradual invasion of Thebes by a barbarism that no one could escape and establishing an incessant to - ing and fro - ing between the two continents ...
... Bacchae and the Phoenician Women recall the Barbarian origin of the man who formerly left the city of Sidon , but the tragedy also tightens the links that bind this Phoenician to Thebes . He is no longer merely the city's founder ; he ...
Contents
General Introduction I | 1 |
3 the Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden fig 4 the Museum | 3 |
of Fine Arts Boston fig 5 the Archaeological Institute of | 10 |
Copyright | |
12 other sections not shown