Aviation Safety: Issues Raised by the Crash of Valujet Flight 592 : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Aviation of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Second Session, June 25, 1996
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subcommittee on Aviation, United States
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997 - 571 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident accomplished action Administrator agency Agreement aircraft airline airplane authority aviation BACHUS believe BRODERICK carriers cause certificate Chairman claim committee complete compliance concerns conduct contained continue correct Court crash determine discrepancies discretionary function documents door DUNCAN effective employees engine exception FAA's fact families Federal FINDING fire flight flying Government hazardous hearing HINSON indicated industry inspection inspectors installed issues JORDAN LIPINSKI look maintenance manual manufacturer materials mechanics noted Office operations oversight oxygen passengers performed person personnel pilots problems procedures question recommendations record regulations release removed repair representatives responsibility result safe safety SCHIAVO Secretary SELLER specific standards statement Thank things Tort TOWNES Transportation United ValuJet
Page 553 - Any claim based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not such statute or regulation be valid, or based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be abused.
Page 553 - Authority, the periods for, and the manner in, which such inspection, servicing, and overhaul shall be made, including provision for examinations and reports by properly qualified private persons whose examinations or reports the Authority may accept in lieu of those made by its officers and employees...
Page 567 - The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 US 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SAUCIER v.
Page 561 - Congress wished to prevent judicial "second-guessing" of legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic, and political policy through the medium of an action in tort.