 Court moeten bij de beoordeling van deskundigenbewijs de volgende factoren in aanmerking worden genomen: '1. whether the theory or technique can be (and has been) tested; 2. whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication;...  Issues and Dilemmas of Biotechnology: A Reference Guideby Bernice Z. Schacter - 1999 - 205 pagesNo preview available - About this book
 | Richard J. Heafey, Don M. Kennedy - 2016 - 906 pages
...2-4. 27 (WW Norton & Co., NY, 1995). purposes of admissibility, including (1) whether it can be, and has been, tested; (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) what the known or potential rate of error is, and whether standards controlling a technique's operation... | |
 | Larry Kramer - 1996 - 468 pages
...been) tested — a concept the Court referred to as falsifiability. (2) Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication. (3) The known or potential rate of error and the existence and maintenance of standards controlling the technique's operation. (4) General acceptance... | |
 | Howard H. Kaufman, Jeff L. Lewin - 1997 - 272 pages
...testability or falsifiability ("whether it can be (or has been) tested"); 2. "whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication";...3. "the known or potential rate of error"; and 4. "general acceptance" within a relevant scientific community ("A 'reliability assessment does not require,... | |
 | Patricia Murphy, John M. Williams - 1998 - 354 pages
...otherwise. The courts should consider such matters as: (1) Whether the theory or technique can be and has been tested; (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) its known rate or potential rate of error; and (4) its general acceptance in the scientific community.... | |
 | Edward P. Richards, Katharine C. Rathbun - 1999 - 538 pages
...jury: 1. whether the expert's theory can be or has been tested 2. whether the theory has been subject to peer review and publication 3. the known or potential rate of error of a technique or theory when applied 4. the existence and maintenance of standards and controls 5.... | |
 | Matthew B. Schiff, Linda C. Kramer - 2000 - 596 pages
...should be admitted. These factors include: (1) whether the theory or technique has been used or can be tested; (2) whether it has been "subjected to peer review and publication"; (3) to what extent the evidence presented is subject to error; and( 4) whether the expert testimony is... | |
 | Fred Chris Smith, Rebecca Gurley Bace - 2003 - 560 pages
...a four-pan test for scientific opinions: (1) whether the theory or technique in question can be and has been tested, (2) whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication, (3) its known or potential rate of error along with the existence and maintenance of standards controlling... | |
 | Robert I. Simon, Daniel W. Shuman - 2008 - 496 pages
...methodology should consider the following: 1 . Whether the theory or technique in question can be and has been tested 2. Whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication 3. Its known or potential error rate 5 . Whether it has attracted widespread acceptance within the relevant... | |
 | Norah Rudin, Keith Inman - 2001 - 332 pages
...trial courts in determining admissibility: 1. Whether the theory or technique in question can be (and has been) tested 2. Whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication 3. Its known or potential error rate, and the existence and maintenance of standards controlling its operation... | |
| |
