Department of Education Oversight, Gatekeeping: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Second Session, June 6, 1996U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997 - 239 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 42
Page 3
I am pleased to join you to consider current efforts to prevent fraud , waste , and abuse among postsecondary institutions receiving Federal student aid grants and loans . Our purpose in today's hearing is to examine the gatekeeping ...
I am pleased to join you to consider current efforts to prevent fraud , waste , and abuse among postsecondary institutions receiving Federal student aid grants and loans . Our purpose in today's hearing is to examine the gatekeeping ...
Page 7
The proportion of proprietary school students receiving title IV aid has also been declining . The proportion receiving aid fell from nearly 80 percent in the 1986-87 school year to about 67 percent in the 1992-93 school year .
The proportion of proprietary school students receiving title IV aid has also been declining . The proportion receiving aid fell from nearly 80 percent in the 1986-87 school year to about 67 percent in the 1992-93 school year .
Page 10
... describing trends in some quantitative measures , such as default rates , and laying out the framework for ( 1 ) examining the legislative provision limiting Title IV participation to schools receiving at least 15 percent of their ...
... describing trends in some quantitative measures , such as default rates , and laying out the framework for ( 1 ) examining the legislative provision limiting Title IV participation to schools receiving at least 15 percent of their ...
Page 17
The proportion receiving " These figures include subsidized Stafford loans , Parent Loans for Undergraduate Students , and Supplemental Loans for Students , but not unsubsidized Stafford loans . aid fell from nearly 80 percent in ...
The proportion receiving " These figures include subsidized Stafford loans , Parent Loans for Undergraduate Students , and Supplemental Loans for Students , but not unsubsidized Stafford loans . aid fell from nearly 80 percent in ...
Page 18
aid fell from nearly 80 percent in 1986-87 to about 67 percent in 1992-93 , while the proportion of students receiving aid at the public and private nonprofit schools remained steady . Furthermore , for proprietary school students who ...
aid fell from nearly 80 percent in 1986-87 to about 67 percent in 1992-93 , while the proportion of students receiving aid at the public and private nonprofit schools remained steady . Furthermore , for proprietary school students who ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accountability accrediting agencies addition administrative Amendments analysis annual total data areas assessment associated average BARNES believe BLANCHETTE certification coefficients cohort data Commission committee completion concerns Congress consistent continuing correlation declined default rates definition Department Department of Education determine develop effect eligibility enrollment ensure faculty Federal Figure five full-time funds gatekeeping going graduation rates higher education improve included increase independent indicates institutions less licensing loans LONGANECKER look mean measures meet obtained offered operation outcomes oversight part-time participate Pell grants percent percentage percentage points performance placement postsecondary presented prior problem programs proprietary schools question reasons receiving regression regulations relationship requirements responsibility role school characteristics schools and colleges SHAYS significant staff standards statistically Table Title IV Title IV programs turnover variables vocational withdrawal rates
Popular passages
Page 6 - I would ask unanimous consent that all members of the subcommittee be permitted to place any opening statement in the record and that the record remain open for 3 days for that purpose. Without objection, so ordered. I also ask unanimous consent that our witnesses be permitted to include their written statements in the record.
Page 94 - SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS, COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT, Washington, DC.
Page 97 - Success with respect to student achievement in relation to the institution's mission, including, as appropriate, consideration of course completion, State licensing examination, and job placement rates.
Page 98 - Its mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the Nation.
Page 67 - ... a program of training to prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation; and (4) is a public or other nonprofit institution.
Page 13 - Protecting an institution against harmful internal and external pressures! 6. Creating goals for self-improvement of weaker programs and stimulating a general raising of standards among educational institutions; 7. Involving the faculty and staff comprehensively in institutional evaluation and planning; 8. Establishing criteria for professional certification, licensure, and for upgrading courses offering such preparation; and 9. Providing one basis for determining eligibility for Federal assistance.
Page 62 - Department to attain clear, measurable and binding performance standards to help meet the requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1 993 (GPRA).
Page 118 - I will be happy to respond to any questions the members of the subcommittee may have, and I ask that my complete statement be included in the record.
Page 178 - Beginning in 1980. total includes some schools accredited by the Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges of Technology. 6 Included under "private nonprofit.
Page 40 - Congress to improve the eligibility and certification process, and our combined efforts nave paid off handsomely. For example, the percentage of initial applications for certification that are denied has increased substantially, from 16.6 percent in 1990 to 30.5 percent in 1992 to nearly 40 percent in 1995, reflecting our tougher standards for certification. Furthermore, the sheer number of initial applications for certification has declined more than 50 percent since 1991.