Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volume 64Robert Clark, 1901 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 32
Page vi
... Zanesville v . Telephone Co ... 67 Zanesville Tel . & Tel . Co. , Zanesville v 67 Sticken v . Schmidt .............. 354 Straub , Hutchinson v ......... 413 Swisher v . McWhinney 343 Theobald v . Fugman ... ..... PAGE PAGE Addy v ...
... Zanesville v . Telephone Co ... 67 Zanesville Tel . & Tel . Co. , Zanesville v 67 Sticken v . Schmidt .............. 354 Straub , Hutchinson v ......... 413 Swisher v . McWhinney 343 Theobald v . Fugman ... ..... PAGE PAGE Addy v ...
Page xvii
... Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Company , 67 . Section 3461 , Revised Statutes . Magnetic telegraph companies . How right to use public ground acquired . Zanesville V. Telegraph and Telephone Company , 67 . and Tele- Section 3454 ...
... Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Company , 67 . Section 3461 , Revised Statutes . Magnetic telegraph companies . How right to use public ground acquired . Zanesville V. Telegraph and Telephone Company , 67 . and Tele- Section 3454 ...
Page 66
... one acts as such , and if sued , should be sued as such , and can prosecute error as such even though the others refuse to join in Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Co. such error proceedings 66 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO . [ Vol . ]
... one acts as such , and if sued , should be sued as such , and can prosecute error as such even though the others refuse to join in Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Co. such error proceedings 66 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO . [ Vol . ]
Page 67
... ZANESVILLE U. THE ZANESVILLE TELE- GRAPH AND TELEPHONE COMPANY . Distribution of powers of state - Power conferred on court of justice - Effect of in determining its judicial character - Pro- ceedings in a court of justice for the ...
... ZANESVILLE U. THE ZANESVILLE TELE- GRAPH AND TELEPHONE COMPANY . Distribution of powers of state - Power conferred on court of justice - Effect of in determining its judicial character - Pro- ceedings in a court of justice for the ...
Page 68
Ohio. Supreme Court. Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Co. 4. Where the law confers a right , and authorizes an application ... Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Co. judgment rendered affirming 68 [ Vol . ] SUPREME COURT OF OHIO .
Ohio. Supreme Court. Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Co. 4. Where the law confers a right , and authorizes an application ... Zanesville v . Telegraph and Telephone Co. judgment rendered affirming 68 [ Vol . ] SUPREME COURT OF OHIO .
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
45 Ohio St 50 Ohio St alleged amount application assignee Attorney authorized aver Bank board of park bond BURKET certificate Cincinnati circuit court claim common pleas construction contract corporation coupons court of common creditors deed defendant in error demurrer district duty equity ex rel fact filed free turnpike fund Hamilton county held Hopewell township injury insolvent Investment issue John Shillito John Shillito Co John Shillito Company judgment jurisdiction jury land levy liability lien Mahler ment MINSHALL mortgage Ohio Southern Railroad Ohio St owner paid pany parties payment Perry county personal property petition plaintiff in error premiums probate court proceeding Railroad Co railroad company Railway real estate real property receiver redemption rendered replevin Revised Statutes road SHAUCK Stat street suit sureties taxation Telegraph thereof thereto tion tontine township trust valuation verdict Wabash Railroad Zanesville
Popular passages
Page 220 - ... such other and further relief as the nature of the case may require, and as to this court may seem meet and agreeable to equity and good conscience.
Page 139 - When the death of one is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, the personal representatives of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he lived, against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission.
Page 427 - If the defendant appears, the cause becomes mainly a suit in personam, with the added incident that the property attached remains liable, under the control of the court, to answer to any demand which may be established against the defendant by the final judgment of the court. But if there is no appearance of the defendant, and no service of process on him, the case becomes in its essential nature a proceeding in rem...
Page 29 - An action is an ordinary proceeding in a court of justice, by which a party prosecutes another party for the enforcement or protection of a right, the redress or prevention of a wrong, or the punishment of a public offence. § 3. [3.] Special proceeding. Every other remedy is a special proceeding.
Page 128 - Every deposit is a direct trust. Every person who receives money to be paid to another, or to be applied to a particular purpose to which he does not apply it, is a trustee, and may be sued either at law for money had and received, or in equity, as a trustee, for a breach of trust.
Page 29 - An attempt to commence an action shall be deemed equivalent to the commencement thereof within the meaning of this...
Page 64 - The writ of mandamus may be denominated the writ of mandate.— 1873-345. 1085. It may be issued by any court, except a justice's or police court, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station...
Page 324 - ... burying grounds, public school houses, houses used exclusively for public worship, institutions of purely public charity, public property used exclusively for any public purpose, and personal property, to an amount not exceeding in value two hundred dollars, for each individual, may, by general laws, be exempted from taxation...
Page 122 - Ohio:" all prosecutions shall be carried on in the name and by the authority of the State of Ohio ; and all indictments shall conclude, "against the peace and dignity of the same.
Page 392 - In all other cases the court may direct the jury to find a special verdict in writing, upon all or any of the issues, and in all cases may instruct them, if they render a general verdict, to find upon particular questions of fact, to be stated in writing, and may direct a written finding thereon.