Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Page 7
As you know , a provision exists in Section 5 ( d ) ( 2 ) of P.L. 874 which prohibits States from taking impact aid payments into consideration when determining eligibity for , or the amount of , State funding .
As you know , a provision exists in Section 5 ( d ) ( 2 ) of P.L. 874 which prohibits States from taking impact aid payments into consideration when determining eligibity for , or the amount of , State funding .
Page 8
... 25 percent or more of its Average Daily Attendance comprised of " A " category pupils it is entitled to 100 percent of the local contribution rate of each subcategory “ A ” pupil . Payments It is even harder to determine how much a 8.
... 25 percent or more of its Average Daily Attendance comprised of " A " category pupils it is entitled to 100 percent of the local contribution rate of each subcategory “ A ” pupil . Payments It is even harder to determine how much a 8.
Page 9
Payments It is even harder to determine how much a district should receive in payment . The Act calls for three levels or tiers of funding . The first tier provides for 25 percent of the funds for each category of entitlement including ...
Payments It is even harder to determine how much a district should receive in payment . The Act calls for three levels or tiers of funding . The first tier provides for 25 percent of the funds for each category of entitlement including ...
Page 12
As you know , a provision exists in section 5 ( d ) ( 2 ) of Public Law 874 which prohibits States from taking impact aid payments into consideration when determining eligibility for or the amount of State funding .
As you know , a provision exists in section 5 ( d ) ( 2 ) of Public Law 874 which prohibits States from taking impact aid payments into consideration when determining eligibility for or the amount of State funding .
Page 16
This large number is essential in order to treat the subcategories differently , in the second or third payment tiers , identify amounts for low rent and handicanped pupils and determine amounts for use of the various hold - harmless ...
This large number is essential in order to treat the subcategories differently , in the second or third payment tiers , identify amounts for low rent and handicanped pupils and determine amounts for use of the various hold - harmless ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional administration agencies aid program allow amendment amount application appropriation average base believe BELL bill budget Chairman Chairman PERKINS changes child City City School Commissioner committee Community concern Congress considered cost County delay determine Difference effect effort Elementary entitlement equalization estimated example expenditures fact Federal figures fiscal Fish follows Ford formula funds give going Government hearing High School impact aid increase Independent School indicate intent legislation look loss means MEEDS ment military million Montgomery Office of Education operating payments percent position present problem proposal provisions public housing Public Schools pupils qualify question QUIE receive reduction represents result School District school systems statement talking testimony Thank tier tion trying understand Unified School Union Unit York