Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Page 8
If the program did not qualify under this so - called " disparity " test , but the State could show that the application of that standard to the program was inequitable because of peculiar circumstances related to expenditures in that ...
If the program did not qualify under this so - called " disparity " test , but the State could show that the application of that standard to the program was inequitable because of peculiar circumstances related to expenditures in that ...
Page 9
... it has been programmed and tested for accuracy , but this total process which includes collection and verification of data and processing of applications will make it difficult to pay local educational agencies on a timely basis .
... it has been programmed and tested for accuracy , but this total process which includes collection and verification of data and processing of applications will make it difficult to pay local educational agencies on a timely basis .
Page 10
If the intention was to fund all such applications for several years on this special basis ... However , such action does not permit making funds available to an LEA , if required , in the year of application . Inequities in impact aid ...
If the intention was to fund all such applications for several years on this special basis ... However , such action does not permit making funds available to an LEA , if required , in the year of application . Inequities in impact aid ...
Page 11
We believe that this program has now reached a critical point in terms of administrative complexity , inequities in application , and lack of clarity of purpose . Only a major revision of the program will suffice .
We believe that this program has now reached a critical point in terms of administrative complexity , inequities in application , and lack of clarity of purpose . Only a major revision of the program will suffice .
Page 13
If the program did not qualify under this so - called " disparity ” test but the state could show that the application of that standard to the program was inequitable because of peculiar circumstances related to expenditures in that ...
If the program did not qualify under this so - called " disparity ” test but the state could show that the application of that standard to the program was inequitable because of peculiar circumstances related to expenditures in that ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional administration agencies aid program allow amendment amount application appropriation average base believe BELL bill budget Chairman Chairman PERKINS changes child City City School Commissioner committee Community concern Congress considered cost County delay determine Difference effect effort Elementary entitlement equalization estimated example expenditures fact Federal figures fiscal Fish follows Ford formula funds give going Government hearing High School impact aid increase Independent School indicate intent legislation look loss means MEEDS ment military million Montgomery Office of Education operating payments percent position present problem proposal provisions public housing Public Schools pupils qualify question QUIE receive reduction represents result School District school systems statement talking testimony Thank tier tion trying understand Unified School Union Unit York
Bibliographic information
| Title | Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 |
| Original from | Purdue University |
| Digitized | 8 Sep 2011 |
| Length | 169 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |