Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 46
Page 2
Mr. Chairman , we in New Mexico have implemented what has been acknowledged as one of the finest equalization plans for public school financing in the country . We think we have removed the inequities which formerly resulted in property ...
Mr. Chairman , we in New Mexico have implemented what has been acknowledged as one of the finest equalization plans for public school financing in the country . We think we have removed the inequities which formerly resulted in property ...
Page 3
I do have New Mexico's expert here if you care to ask him what the effect of our equalization plan would be . Chairman PERKINS . It is my understanding of the Meeds amendment that it would consider only current expenditures and not debt ...
I do have New Mexico's expert here if you care to ask him what the effect of our equalization plan would be . Chairman PERKINS . It is my understanding of the Meeds amendment that it would consider only current expenditures and not debt ...
Page 4
Yes , sir , your points are quite good in that the reason that a State must have an equalization plan and must meet the criteria for an equalization plan is that it takes into account the needs of all the school districts and all the ...
Yes , sir , your points are quite good in that the reason that a State must have an equalization plan and must meet the criteria for an equalization plan is that it takes into account the needs of all the school districts and all the ...
Page 7
PUBLIC LAW 874 IN FISCAL YEAR 1975 The major implementation problem for Fiscal Year 1975 relates to the question of equalization . As you know , a provision exists in Section 5 ( d ) ( 2 ) of P.L. 874 which prohibits States from taking ...
PUBLIC LAW 874 IN FISCAL YEAR 1975 The major implementation problem for Fiscal Year 1975 relates to the question of equalization . As you know , a provision exists in Section 5 ( d ) ( 2 ) of P.L. 874 which prohibits States from taking ...
Page 8
... expenditures in that State , then the program might , nevertheless , qualify under a set of evaluative criteria which would take into account such matters as the degree of school revenues equalized , whether education expenditures ...
... expenditures in that State , then the program might , nevertheless , qualify under a set of evaluative criteria which would take into account such matters as the degree of school revenues equalized , whether education expenditures ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional administration agencies aid program allow amendment amount application appropriation average base believe BELL bill budget Chairman Chairman PERKINS changes child City City School Commissioner committee Community concern Congress considered cost County delay determine Difference effect effort Elementary entitlement equalization estimated example expenditures fact Federal figures fiscal Fish follows Ford formula funds give going Government hearing High School impact aid increase Independent School indicate intent legislation look loss means MEEDS ment military million Montgomery Office of Education operating payments percent position present problem proposal provisions public housing Public Schools pupils qualify question QUIE receive reduction represents result School District school systems statement talking testimony Thank tier tion trying understand Unified School Union Unit York