Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 29
Page 2
Qualifying within the equalization plan guidelines will allow New Mexico to utilize Public Law 874 revenues in our plan . There is no major concern on our part with this section of the law or the guidelines currently being discussed by ...
Qualifying within the equalization plan guidelines will allow New Mexico to utilize Public Law 874 revenues in our plan . There is no major concern on our part with this section of the law or the guidelines currently being discussed by ...
Page 8
If such disparity was no greater than 20 percent , then the program would be deemed to qualify for the exception and SAFA payments could be taken into account for the affected districts but only in the proportion allowed by the statute ...
If such disparity was no greater than 20 percent , then the program would be deemed to qualify for the exception and SAFA payments could be taken into account for the affected districts but only in the proportion allowed by the statute ...
Page 13
If such disparity was no greater than 20 percent then the program would be deemed to qualify for the exception and SAFA payments could be taken into account for the affected districts but only in the proportion allowed by the statute .
If such disparity was no greater than 20 percent then the program would be deemed to qualify for the exception and SAFA payments could be taken into account for the affected districts but only in the proportion allowed by the statute .
Page 22
Take for instance in Minnesota where we have the State equalization where 70 percent of the money comes from the State . It got a little higher . Then there was a levy limit placed on each school district . They are only allowed to go ...
Take for instance in Minnesota where we have the State equalization where 70 percent of the money comes from the State . It got a little higher . Then there was a levy limit placed on each school district . They are only allowed to go ...
Page 24
Does that mean he is only allowed to go 10 percent over the median ? Mr. BELL . There would still be the opportunity for districts that wanted to make the additional effort , to have 20 percent more money by additional effort ...
Does that mean he is only allowed to go 10 percent over the median ? Mr. BELL . There would still be the opportunity for districts that wanted to make the additional effort , to have 20 percent more money by additional effort ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional administration agencies aid program allow amendment amount application appropriation average base believe BELL bill budget Chairman Chairman PERKINS changes child City City School Commissioner committee Community concern Congress considered cost County delay determine Difference effect effort Elementary entitlement equalization estimated example expenditures fact Federal figures fiscal Fish follows Ford formula funds give going Government hearing High School impact aid increase Independent School indicate intent legislation look loss means MEEDS ment military million Montgomery Office of Education operating payments percent position present problem proposal provisions public housing Public Schools pupils qualify question QUIE receive reduction represents result School District school systems statement talking testimony Thank tier tion trying understand Unified School Union Unit York
Bibliographic information
| Title | Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 |
| Original from | Purdue University |
| Digitized | 8 Sep 2011 |
| Length | 169 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |