Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 33
Page
... California EDWIN D. ESHLEMAN , Pennsylvania WILLIAM D. FORD , Michigan PETER A. PEYSER , New York PATSY T. MINK , Hawaii ( on leave ) RONALD A. SARASIN , Connecticut LLOYD MEEDS , Washington JOHN BUCHANAN , Alabama PHILLIP BURTON ...
... California EDWIN D. ESHLEMAN , Pennsylvania WILLIAM D. FORD , Michigan PETER A. PEYSER , New York PATSY T. MINK , Hawaii ( on leave ) RONALD A. SARASIN , Connecticut LLOYD MEEDS , Washington JOHN BUCHANAN , Alabama PHILLIP BURTON ...
Page
... New York , accompanied by Bertha Leviton --- 68 Henry , Dr. Paul , associate superintendent of Montgomery County Schools 145 Hinshaw , Hon . Andrew J. , a Representative in Congress from the State of California , and Hon .
... New York , accompanied by Bertha Leviton --- 68 Henry , Dr. Paul , associate superintendent of Montgomery County Schools 145 Hinshaw , Hon . Andrew J. , a Representative in Congress from the State of California , and Hon .
Page
6 , Trenton , N. Dak . , letter to Senator Quentin N. Burdick , dated April 14 , 1975 --- Gifford , Dr. Bernard R. , deputy chancellor , on behalf of the School District of the City of New York , prepared statement of Henry , Paul A.
6 , Trenton , N. Dak . , letter to Senator Quentin N. Burdick , dated April 14 , 1975 --- Gifford , Dr. Bernard R. , deputy chancellor , on behalf of the School District of the City of New York , prepared statement of Henry , Paul A.
Page 27
Pursuing that a little bit further , for example , the city of New York is eligible for only approximately $ 4 million in imUnder your proposal the city of New York would get nothing . Is that correct ? Mr. BELL . Yes . Mrs. CHISHOLM .
Pursuing that a little bit further , for example , the city of New York is eligible for only approximately $ 4 million in imUnder your proposal the city of New York would get nothing . Is that correct ? Mr. BELL . Yes . Mrs. CHISHOLM .
Page 28
Let me answer your first question with respect to whether New York would qualify under the proposal . The answer would be , “ No. ” It would not . As I understand your second question the children residing on lowrent housing would under ...
Let me answer your first question with respect to whether New York would qualify under the proposal . The answer would be , “ No. ” It would not . As I understand your second question the children residing on lowrent housing would under ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional administration agencies aid program allow amendment amount application appropriation average base believe BELL bill budget Chairman Chairman PERKINS changes child City City School Commissioner committee Community concern Congress considered cost County delay determine Difference effect effort Elementary entitlement equalization estimated example expenditures fact Federal figures fiscal Fish follows Ford formula funds give going Government hearing High School impact aid increase Independent School indicate intent legislation look loss means MEEDS ment military million Montgomery Office of Education operating payments percent position present problem proposal provisions public housing Public Schools pupils qualify question QUIE receive reduction represents result School District school systems statement talking testimony Thank tier tion trying understand Unified School Union Unit York