Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 36
Page 2
... differences among local school districts . No longer are children in New Mexico penalized in their educational opportunities due to the wealth of their particular community . At the same time New Mexico provides for the varying needs of ...
... differences among local school districts . No longer are children in New Mexico penalized in their educational opportunities due to the wealth of their particular community . At the same time New Mexico provides for the varying needs of ...
Page 9
... difference between payment received from an appropriation shared with low - rent housing pupils and the payment that would have been received if the appropriation were not so shared . The first two of these provisions are applicable in ...
... difference between payment received from an appropriation shared with low - rent housing pupils and the payment that would have been received if the appropriation were not so shared . The first two of these provisions are applicable in ...
Page 11
... difference . About 900 districts presently receive more than five percent of such expenses from P.L. 874 funds and thus would be eligible for payment in 1976. Of the current districts receiving impact aid approximately 2,400 receive ...
... difference . About 900 districts presently receive more than five percent of such expenses from P.L. 874 funds and thus would be eligible for payment in 1976. Of the current districts receiving impact aid approximately 2,400 receive ...
Page 17
... difference between payment received from an appropriation shared with low - rent housing pupils and the payment that would have been received if the appropriation were not so shared . The first two of these provisions are applicable in ...
... difference between payment received from an appropriation shared with low - rent housing pupils and the payment that would have been received if the appropriation were not so shared . The first two of these provisions are applicable in ...
Page 18
... difference . About 900 districts presently receive more than 5 percent of such expenses from Public Law 874 funds and thus would be eligible for pavment in 1976 . Of the current districts receiving impact aid approximately 2.400 receive ...
... difference . About 900 districts presently receive more than 5 percent of such expenses from Public Law 874 funds and thus would be eligible for pavment in 1976 . Of the current districts receiving impact aid approximately 2.400 receive ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
25 percent amount appropriation average BELL bill Brevard County budget Chairman PERKINS CHISHOLM City School Commissioner committee concept paper Congress congressional cost of education DAVID FISH debt service District Old law educational agencies effect Elementary eligible entitlement equalization formula expenditures fiscal year 1976 FISH FORD Fort Benning Fremont County going GOODLING handicapped children High School hold-harmless provisions Husk impact aid program Independent School law New law law tier leeway legislation low-rent housing MEEDS ment military Montgomery County MONTGOMERY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of Education Okaloosa County Onslow County payments Phenix City Prince Georges County problem proposal public housing pupils public housing students Public Law 874 Public Schools qualify question QUIE receive reduction on TCE revenue Russell County School District school systems statement STORMER testimony Thank tier 2 Difference tion trict Unified School District York City