Oversight Hearings on the Impact Aid Laws and Testimony on H.R. 5181: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on H.R. 5181 ... February 27, April 9 and 15, 1975U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 169 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 77
Page
Clair Burgener , a Representative in Congress from the State of California -- Husk , Samuel B. , executive vice president , Council of the Great City Schools ... 131 Petriccione , Anthony , senior budget analyst , Prince Georges County ...
Clair Burgener , a Representative in Congress from the State of California -- Husk , Samuel B. , executive vice president , Council of the Great City Schools ... 131 Petriccione , Anthony , senior budget analyst , Prince Georges County ...
Page
6 , Trenton , N. Dak . , letter to Senator Quentin N. Burdick , dated April 14 , 1975 --- Gifford , Dr. Bernard R. , deputy chancellor , on behalf of the School District of the City of New York , prepared statement of Henry , Paul A.
6 , Trenton , N. Dak . , letter to Senator Quentin N. Burdick , dated April 14 , 1975 --- Gifford , Dr. Bernard R. , deputy chancellor , on behalf of the School District of the City of New York , prepared statement of Henry , Paul A.
Page 25
It exacerbates the situation in those States that have a single large city . In California , Los Angeles , you count that as one district . If you take 5 percent you would find all the big cities in that State .
It exacerbates the situation in those States that have a single large city . In California , Los Angeles , you count that as one district . If you take 5 percent you would find all the big cities in that State .
Page 26
That again was because of the deep concern we had about the concentrations of large numbers of people in our city school districts versus rural areas in the State . We did not want you to say that ...
That again was because of the deep concern we had about the concentrations of large numbers of people in our city school districts versus rural areas in the State . We did not want you to say that ...
Page 27
Pursuing that a little bit further , for example , the city of New York is eligible for only approximately $ 4 million in imUnder your proposal the city of New York would get nothing . Is that correct ? Mr. BELL . Yes . Mrs. CHISHOLM .
Pursuing that a little bit further , for example , the city of New York is eligible for only approximately $ 4 million in imUnder your proposal the city of New York would get nothing . Is that correct ? Mr. BELL . Yes . Mrs. CHISHOLM .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
additional administration agencies aid program allow amendment amount application appropriation average base believe BELL bill budget Chairman Chairman PERKINS changes child City City School Commissioner committee Community concern Congress considered cost County delay determine Difference effect effort Elementary entitlement equalization estimated example expenditures fact Federal figures fiscal Fish follows Ford formula funds give going Government hearing High School impact aid increase Independent School indicate intent legislation look loss means MEEDS ment military million Montgomery Office of Education operating payments percent position present problem proposal provisions public housing Public Schools pupils qualify question QUIE receive reduction represents result School District school systems statement talking testimony Thank tier tion trying understand Unified School Union Unit York