Greeks And BarbariansHow did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks. The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time.The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history.Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 41
Page ii
... University of Chicago This series introduces English-speaking students to central themes in the history of the ancient world and to the range of scholarly approaches to those themes, within and across disciplines.
... University of Chicago This series introduces English-speaking students to central themes in the history of the ancient world and to the range of scholarly approaches to those themes, within and across disciplines.
Page 8
He also ascribes a Greek-style ethnocentrism to both Persians and Egyptians: the Egyptians, he claims, call all those who do not speak their language 'barbarians' (2.158; cf. 1.134).46 Other authors similarly confound any simple ...
He also ascribes a Greek-style ethnocentrism to both Persians and Egyptians: the Egyptians, he claims, call all those who do not speak their language 'barbarians' (2.158; cf. 1.134).46 Other authors similarly confound any simple ...
Page 11
... so adopting the linguistic ethnocentrism of the Egyptians and turning on its head the Greek idea of the barbaros (a term which seems originally to have designated those who could not speak Greek).60 Contact, however, may equally.
... so adopting the linguistic ethnocentrism of the Egyptians and turning on its head the Greek idea of the barbaros (a term which seems originally to have designated those who could not speak Greek).60 Contact, however, may equally.
Page 12
nated those who could not speak Greek).60 Contact, however, may equally result in the confirmation of stereotypes – as the case of Xenophon, if not also of Herodotus,61 may suggest. We must surely begin, moreover, from what evidence we ...
nated those who could not speak Greek).60 Contact, however, may equally result in the confirmation of stereotypes – as the case of Xenophon, if not also of Herodotus,61 may suggest. We must surely begin, moreover, from what evidence we ...
Page 27
Herodotus is glad to notice that the Egyptians (like the Greeks) “call all those who do not speak their language barbarians” (2. 158). Insofar as this attitude is reasonable in the Egyptians, so also is it reasonable in the Greeks.
Herodotus is glad to notice that the Egyptians (like the Greeks) “call all those who do not speak their language barbarians” (2. 158). Insofar as this attitude is reasonable in the Egyptians, so also is it reasonable in the Greeks.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 | |
15 | |
PART II THEMES | 125 |
PART III PEOPLES | 187 |
PART IV OVERVIEWS | 229 |
Intellectual Chronology | 311 |
Guide to Further Reading | 313 |
Bibliography | 314 |
Index | 328 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according Aeschylus ancient appears argument Asia Athenian Athens authors Barbarian become Cadmus called century classical common concept context contrast course culture customs dialect discussion divine early Egypt Egyptian empire especially ethnic Euripides evidence example existence fact fifth foreign further give gods Greece Greek Hall hand Hellenic Herodotus human idea identity important instance interest interpretation Isocrates Italy king land language later less linguistic matriarchy means mentioned myth nature never nomoi opposition oriental origin Paris particular period Persian Persian Wars Phoenician Plato play political possible present problem question reason refer regard relations religion Roman rule Scythians seems seen shows society sources speak speech story theory thought tradition tragedy turn University various whole women writing