Greeks And BarbariansHow did the Greeks view foreign peoples? This book considers what the Greeks thought of foreigners and their religions, cultures and politics, and what these beliefs and opinions reveal about the Greeks. The Greeks were occasionally intrigued by the customs and religions of the many different peoples with whom they came into contact; more often they were disdainful or dismissive, tending to regard non-Greeks as at best inferior, and at worst as candidates for conquest and enslavement. Facing up to this less attractive aspect of the classical tradition is vital, Thomas Harrison argues, to seeing both what the ancient world was really like and the full nature of its legacy in the modern. In this book he brings together outstanding European and American scholarship to show the difference and complexity of Greek representations of foreign peoples - or barbarians, as the Greeks called them - and how these representations changed over time.The book looks first at the main sources: the Histories of Herodotus, Greek tragedy, and Athenian art. Part II examines how the Greeks distinguished themselves from barbarians through myth, language and religion. Part III considers Greek representations of two different barbarian peoples - the allegedly decadent and effeminate Persians, and the Egyptians, proverbial for their religious wisdom. In part IV three chapters trace the development of the Greek-barbarian antithesis in later history: in nineteenth-century scholarship, in Byzantine and modern Greece, and in western intellectual history.Of the twelve chapters six are published in English for the first time. The editor has provided an extensive general introduction, as well as introductions to the parts. The book contains two maps, a guide to further reading and an intellectual chronology. All passages of ancient languages are translated, and difficult terms are explained. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 54
Page ii
Each volume, edited and introduced by a leading specialist, contains a selection of the most important work, including a significant proportion of translated material. The editor also provides a guide to the history of modern ...
Each volume, edited and introduced by a leading specialist, contains a selection of the most important work, including a significant proportion of translated material. The editor also provides a guide to the history of modern ...
Page 2
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW To begin with, it is important to emphasise the very different historical circumstances that pertained in the case of ancient 'orientalism'. Though the Greeks (from the late eighth century) established a large number ...
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW To begin with, it is important to emphasise the very different historical circumstances that pertained in the case of ancient 'orientalism'. Though the Greeks (from the late eighth century) established a large number ...
Page 10
In an important recent work, Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century, Margaret Miller has collated a mass of fragments of evidence to suggest that 'over the later sixth and fifth centuries a comparatively large proportion of Athenian ...
In an important recent work, Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century, Margaret Miller has collated a mass of fragments of evidence to suggest that 'over the later sixth and fifth centuries a comparatively large proportion of Athenian ...
Page 17
... become soft through their conquests of the soft peoples of Asia, also show how Herodotus' ethnography is vital to his presentation of historical causation.1 Perhaps the most important contribution of Redfield's piece, however, ...
... become soft through their conquests of the soft peoples of Asia, also show how Herodotus' ethnography is vital to his presentation of historical causation.1 Perhaps the most important contribution of Redfield's piece, however, ...
Page 39
(Republic 435E–36A) Egypt and Scythia are here classed with other peoples; the contrast between them is a specific case of a generic contrast, of great importance in Herodotus: the contrast between soft peoples and hard peoples.
(Republic 435E–36A) Egypt and Scythia are here classed with other peoples; the contrast between them is a specific case of a generic contrast, of great importance in Herodotus: the contrast between soft peoples and hard peoples.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
1 | |
15 | |
PART II THEMES | 125 |
PART III PEOPLES | 187 |
PART IV OVERVIEWS | 229 |
Intellectual Chronology | 311 |
Guide to Further Reading | 313 |
Bibliography | 314 |
Index | 328 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according Aeschylus ancient appears argument Asia Athenian Athens authors Barbarian become Cadmus called century classical common concept context contrast course culture customs dialect discussion divine early Egypt Egyptian empire especially ethnic Euripides evidence example existence fact fifth foreign further give gods Greece Greek Hall hand Hellenic Herodotus human idea identity important instance interest interpretation Isocrates Italy king land language later less linguistic matriarchy means mentioned myth nature never nomoi opposition oriental origin Paris particular period Persian Persian Wars Phoenician Plato play political possible present problem question reason refer regard relations religion Roman rule Scythians seems seen shows society sources speak speech story theory thought tradition tragedy turn University various whole women writing