| Kentucky - 1918 - 808 pages
...the fact that the employe may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in...amount of negligence attributable to such employe : Provided that no such employe who may have been injured or killed shall be held to have been guilty... | |
| New Jersey. Supreme Court - 1916 - 848 pages
..."The fact that the employe may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in...amount of negligence attributable to such employe," and then said to them : "If you find that plaintiff's intestate was guilty of contributory negligence,... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1915 - 808 pages
...'The fact that the employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in...proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee.' "The trial judge instructed the jury according to the provisions of section 3 of the act... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 812 pages
...death, the fact tl employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in...proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee." This modifies, as does our own statute, the commonlaw rule formerly applied in this jurisdiction... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 824 pages
...the fact that the employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in...proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee. * * *" Defendant's counsel urged to the trial court, and now argue in their brief, that there... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 806 pages
...the same as a want of ordinary care, plaintiff was entitled to recover, but that his damages should be diminished by the jury in proportion to the amount of negligence of such employee; that if the plaintiff was entitled to recover and if the jury did not find that he... | |
| Illinois. Supreme Court - 1917 - 720 pages
...that "the fact that the employee may be guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in...proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee," and the jury were so instructed. So far as the contention that defendant in error assumed... | |
| 1907 - 600 pages
...recovery where his contributory negligence was slight and that of the employer was gross in comparison, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in...proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee. All questions of negligence and contributory negligence shall be for the jury. "SEC. 3. Thai... | |
| 1917 - 510 pages
..."The fact that the employe may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to the employe." Does this mean that though the employer may be wholly without fault as... | |
| |