Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 12
... period and Petitioners ' failure to include a demonstration in the petition for review that this issue was raised at the public hearing or during the public comment period , as re- quired by Section 124.19 , we conclude that this issue ...
... period and Petitioners ' failure to include a demonstration in the petition for review that this issue was raised at the public hearing or during the public comment period , as re- quired by Section 124.19 , we conclude that this issue ...
Page 17
... period because the Default Order was served upon the parties by mail , see 40 CFR § 22.07 ( c ) ) . B & B did not file its appeal until March 12 , 1992 , 16 days after the period for filing an appeal had expired . The time requirements ...
... period because the Default Order was served upon the parties by mail , see 40 CFR § 22.07 ( c ) ) . B & B did not file its appeal until March 12 , 1992 , 16 days after the period for filing an appeal had expired . The time requirements ...
Page 26
... period . Moreover , we note that the omitted permit provision relates wholly to State - law concerns unrelated to the appli- cable federal PSD regulations at 40 CFR §52.21 . In light of these considerations , we conclude that Ms. West's ...
... period . Moreover , we note that the omitted permit provision relates wholly to State - law concerns unrelated to the appli- cable federal PSD regulations at 40 CFR §52.21 . In light of these considerations , we conclude that Ms. West's ...
Page 32
... period or at the public hearing , even though it was reasonably ascer- tainable at that time . See 40 CFR §§ 124.13 and 124.19 ( a ) . The Region also notes that California Government Code § 54958 does not apply to meetings conducted by ...
... period or at the public hearing , even though it was reasonably ascer- tainable at that time . See 40 CFR §§ 124.13 and 124.19 ( a ) . The Region also notes that California Government Code § 54958 does not apply to meetings conducted by ...
Page 49
... period by incorporating by reference the comments it made during an earlier comment period for a different set of placer mining permits issued in 1989. The Region , however , contends that the definitions requested during the earlier ...
... period by incorporating by reference the comments it made during an earlier comment period for a different set of placer mining permits issued in 1989. The Region , however , contends that the definitions requested during the earlier ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego