Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 6
... granted with respect to : ( 1 ) a typographical error in the federal portion of the permit , which references the wrong section of the state portion of the permit ; ( 2 ) the alleged failure by the Region to require accurate ...
... granted with respect to : ( 1 ) a typographical error in the federal portion of the permit , which references the wrong section of the state portion of the permit ; ( 2 ) the alleged failure by the Region to require accurate ...
Page 25
... granted unless it is based on a clearly erroneous finding of fact or conclusion of law , or involves an important matter of policy or exercise of discretion that warrants review . See 40 CFR § 124.19 ( a ) . The preamble to the ...
... granted unless it is based on a clearly erroneous finding of fact or conclusion of law , or involves an important matter of policy or exercise of discretion that warrants review . See 40 CFR § 124.19 ( a ) . The preamble to the ...
Page 29
... granted Bethlehem Steel's motion to smiss the complaint as barred by the general statute of limitations at 28 U.S.C. ... Granting Motion to Dismiss and reinstates e complaint . Environmental Appeals Judges Before Ronald L. [ cCallum ...
... granted Bethlehem Steel's motion to smiss the complaint as barred by the general statute of limitations at 28 U.S.C. ... Granting Motion to Dismiss and reinstates e complaint . Environmental Appeals Judges Before Ronald L. [ cCallum ...
Page 40
... GRANTING REVIEW IN PART Decided May 29 , 1992 Syllabus In 1991 , U.S. EPA Region X issued a set of virtually identical ... granted on the issue of whether 40 CFR § 125.3 , which requires a permit writer to consider the " process employed ...
... GRANTING REVIEW IN PART Decided May 29 , 1992 Syllabus In 1991 , U.S. EPA Region X issued a set of virtually identical ... granted on the issue of whether 40 CFR § 125.3 , which requires a permit writer to consider the " process employed ...
Page 42
... granted unless the Regional Administra- tor's decision is clearly erroneous or involves an exercise of discretion or policy that is important , and should therefore be reviewed by the Environmental Appeals Board . See IT Corporation ...
... granted unless the Regional Administra- tor's decision is clearly erroneous or involves an exercise of discretion or policy that is important , and should therefore be reviewed by the Environmental Appeals Board . See IT Corporation ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego