Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 26
... discussed above . The second issue relates to Specific Condition 34 of the revised per- mit , which provides as follows : On September 18 , 1991 , the Aqualon Company ( " Aqualon " ) notified the Department that Aqualon had permanently ...
... discussed above . The second issue relates to Specific Condition 34 of the revised per- mit , which provides as follows : On September 18 , 1991 , the Aqualon Company ( " Aqualon " ) notified the Department that Aqualon had permanently ...
Page 42
... discussed below . Mixing Zones : As noted above , the national effluent guidelines for gold placer mining impose a technology - based effluent limitation for settleable solids . MAC argues that when the Region incorporated this effluent ...
... discussed below . Mixing Zones : As noted above , the national effluent guidelines for gold placer mining impose a technology - based effluent limitation for settleable solids . MAC argues that when the Region incorporated this effluent ...
Page 60
... have denied review given the facts of this case as discussed in the previous section dealing with the June 5 modification . So ordered . IN THE MATTER OF RENKIEWICZ SWD - 18 UIC Appeal VOLUME 4 60 ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS.
... have denied review given the facts of this case as discussed in the previous section dealing with the June 5 modification . So ordered . IN THE MATTER OF RENKIEWICZ SWD - 18 UIC Appeal VOLUME 4 60 ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS.
Page 88
... discussed later , Respondent asserts that Red - Z is not a pesticide and thus is exempt from registration under FIFRA . Region II's Director , Environmental Services Division , having de- termined that Red - Z was subject to the ...
... discussed later , Respondent asserts that Red - Z is not a pesticide and thus is exempt from registration under FIFRA . Region II's Director , Environmental Services Division , having de- termined that Red - Z was subject to the ...
Page 94
... discussed , a threshold question , then , is how the envelope was addressed . The record does not contain a copy of the envelope nor a copy of a transmittal letter if there was one . There are two significant documents in the record ...
... discussed , a threshold question , then , is how the envelope was addressed . The record does not contain a copy of the envelope nor a copy of a transmittal letter if there was one . There are two significant documents in the record ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego