Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 9
... demonstrate that he does not violate the environmental performance standards of § 264.601 and the Director agrees with such demonstration , preliminary hydrologic , geologic , and meteoro- logic assessments will suffice . 40 CFR ...
... demonstrate that he does not violate the environmental performance standards of § 264.601 and the Director agrees with such demonstration , preliminary hydrologic , geologic , and meteoro- logic assessments will suffice . 40 CFR ...
Page 14
... demonstrate proficiency with each planned treatment procedure in the MU , even though the permittee has no historical experience with munitions disassembly ; ( 3 ) the per- mit should require the permittee to deal with negative pressure ...
... demonstrate proficiency with each planned treatment procedure in the MU , even though the permittee has no historical experience with munitions disassembly ; ( 3 ) the per- mit should require the permittee to deal with negative pressure ...
Page 19
... demonstrate . PTC makes the following argu- ments : the Region improperly withheld information from the public regarding wastes at the facility on the ground that such information is confidential ; the permit's metal feed rates are ...
... demonstrate . PTC makes the following argu- ments : the Region improperly withheld information from the public regarding wastes at the facility on the ground that such information is confidential ; the permit's metal feed rates are ...
Page 25
... demonstrating that the permit conditions should be reviewed is therefore on the petitioner . In this case , the petitioners have not carried that burden . Background : An earlier version of the permit was issued on April 8 , 1991 ...
... demonstrating that the permit conditions should be reviewed is therefore on the petitioner . In this case , the petitioners have not carried that burden . Background : An earlier version of the permit was issued on April 8 , 1991 ...
Page 61
... demonstrate that review is appropriate under the applicable appeal provision , 40 CFR § 124.19 . Before Environmental Appeals Judges Ronald L. McCallum , Edward E. Reich , and Timothy J. Dowling ( Acting ) . Opinion of the Board by ...
... demonstrate that review is appropriate under the applicable appeal provision , 40 CFR § 124.19 . Before Environmental Appeals Judges Ronald L. McCallum , Edward E. Reich , and Timothy J. Dowling ( Acting ) . Opinion of the Board by ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego