Environmental Administrative Decisions: Decisions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Volume 4U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... decision in 3M Company ( Minnesota Mining and Manufac- turing ) , TSCA Appeal No. 90-3 ( February 28 , 1992 ) , holding that the five - year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2462 does not apply to the assessment of administrative ...
... decision in 3M Company ( Minnesota Mining and Manufac- turing ) , TSCA Appeal No. 90-3 ( February 28 , 1992 ) , holding that the five - year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2462 does not apply to the assessment of administrative ...
Page 17
... decision must be filed with the Agency within 20 days after the initial decision has been served upon the parties . 40 CFR § 22.30 ( a ) . Region V's Regional Hearing Clerk received the Default Order from the Presiding Officer on ...
... decision must be filed with the Agency within 20 days after the initial decision has been served upon the parties . 40 CFR § 22.30 ( a ) . Region V's Regional Hearing Clerk received the Default Order from the Presiding Officer on ...
Page 31
... decision of U.S. EPA Region IX to issue a permit under Section 3005 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to Cargill , Inc. for its hazardous waste incinerator in Lynwood , California . Petitioner argues that the Region did not ...
... decision of U.S. EPA Region IX to issue a permit under Section 3005 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act to Cargill , Inc. for its hazardous waste incinerator in Lynwood , California . Petitioner argues that the Region did not ...
Page 33
... decision of the Administrator in this case . The Administrator's decision denied a request of the petitioner to overturn portions of an earlier decision by the Agency's Chief Judicial Officer . The Administrator's decision held , inter ...
... decision of the Administrator in this case . The Administrator's decision denied a request of the petitioner to overturn portions of an earlier decision by the Agency's Chief Judicial Officer . The Administrator's decision held , inter ...
Page 34
... decision in this matter.2 The Administrator's decision denied a request by the petitioner to overturn portions of an earlier decision by the Agency's Chief Judicial Officer ( " CJO " ) . 3 By separate order dated September 4 , 1990 ...
... decision in this matter.2 The Administrator's decision denied a request by the petitioner to overturn portions of an earlier decision by the Agency's Chief Judicial Officer ( " CJO " ) . 3 By separate order dated September 4 , 1990 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Adcom Agency Agency's alleged amended argues argument asserts authority BACT Biddle Sawyer biomonitoring certification Clean Water Act complaint compliance conclude corrective action Crumb Rubber demonstration determination discharge disposal draft permit dredged effluent effluent limitations emissions EPA Region EPA's EPCRA evidentiary hearing request facility failed federal filed final permit GE's Genicom Hadson hazardous waste HSWA impact implementing incinerator Initial Decision interim submission issuance ment motion NPDES Appeal NPDES permit OCPSF Odessa operation outfall penalty permit application permit conditions permit decision permit modification permittee petition for review Petitioner PG&E pollutants Presiding Officer Presiding Officer's procedures proposed provides pursuant raised RCRA Appeal reasons Region II Region's Response Regional Administrator regulations remand requirements revised Ronald L rule Section SELC specific submitted Subpart SWMU tion treatment TSCA U.S. EPA VDAPC violation Waste Management water quality standards Wego